Literature DB >> 20947149

Flexible ureteroscopy is effective for proximal ureteral stones in both obese and nonobese patients: a two-year, single-surgeon experience.

Sara L Best1, Stephen Y Nakada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a retrospective series of proximal ureteral stone ureteroscopies (URS) by a single surgeon, using results presented in a recommended format from the American Urological Association Ureteral Stone Guideline panel, with an emphasis on outcomes related to obesity.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a single surgeon's 2-year URS experience was performed. Of the 55 ureteroscopies for proximal ureteral calculi, 49 cases involving 43 patients had evaluable postoperative imaging.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 56 years and average body mass index was 32.5 kg/m(2). Average ureteral stone size was 9.1 mm; 51% had been preoperatively stented and 93% were stented postoperatively. The overall ureteral stone-free rate was 86%. Overall, 5/43 patients (11%), none of whom were obese, required a second procedure. Obese patients had a 91% stone-free rate, statistically equivalent to the 81% rate in the nonobese. Three patients (7%) developed postoperative urinary tract infections. One patient came to the emergency department for stent-related discomfort. One patient treated in a staged setting for bilateral ureteral calculi developed urinary tract infection and systemic inflammatory response system complicated by alcohol withdrawal requiring a 3-day non-intensive care unit admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal ureteral calculi can be successfully treated with URS most of the time, but the risk for persistent renal calculi and fragments exists. The complication rate is low and operative times are short. Obese patients can also be successfully treated ureteroscopically. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947149     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  12 in total

Review 1.  Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Roberto Peschechera; Gianluigi Taverna; Giuseppe Sortino; Luca Cindolo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Factors affecting complication rates of retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopy: analysis of 1571 procedures-a single-center experience.

Authors:  Okan Baş; Can Tuygun; Onur Dede; Sercan Sarı; Mehmet Çağlar Çakıcı; Ufuk Öztürk; Göksel Göktuğ; Abdurrahim İmamoğlu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A prospective trial on ureteral stenting combined with secondary ureteroscopy after an initial failed procedure.

Authors:  Changwei Ji; Weidong Gan; Hongqian Guo; Huibo Lian; Shiwei Zhang; Rong Yang; Xiaozhi Zhao
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-04-12

4.  RIRS is equally efficient in patients with different BMI scores.

Authors:  Erdal Alkan; Emre Arpali; A Oguz Ozkanli; Murat M Basar; Oguz Acar; M Derya Balbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Does morbid obesity influence the success and complication rates of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones?

Authors:  Onur Dede; Nevzat Can Şener; Okan Baş; Gülay Dede; Muhammet Şahin Bağbancı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

6.  A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Manoj Monga; Margaret S Pearle; Jodi A Antonelli; Michelle J Semins; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman; Vernon M Pais; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Brian H Eisner; Ojas Shah; Roger L Sur; Patrick W Mufarrij; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Renal Pelvis Stones of 10-20 mm in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Babak Javanmard; Mohammad Reza Razaghi; Anahita Ansari Jafari; Mohammad Mohsen Mazloomfard
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-27

8.  Impact of obesity on retrograde ureteroscopic approach.

Authors:  M Drăguţescu; R Mulţescu; B Geavlete; B Mihai; E Ceban; P Geavlete
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2012-06-18

9.  The Gachon University Ureteral Narrowing score: A comprehensive standardized system for predicting necessity of ureteral dilatation to treat proximal ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Seung Kyu Lee; Tae Beom Kim; Kwang-Pil Ko; Chang Hee Kim; Kwang Taek Kim; Kyung Jin Chung; Khae Hawn Kim; Han Jung; Sang Jin Yoon; Jin Kyu Oh
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-07-05

Review 10.  Flexible ureteroscopy: Technological advancements, current indications and outcomes in the treatment of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Husain Alenezi; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.