Literature DB >> 16697818

Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi with active fragment extraction and computerized tomography followup.

Andrew J Portis1, Rebecca Rygwall, Cindy Holtz, Nicole Pshon, Mark Laliberte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Management of fragments generated by ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy remains controversial. In this study we explored the impact of active fragment extraction after ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy on stone clearance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 69 patients with 3 or less upper urinary tract calculi (5 to 15 mm) demonstrated on preoperative CT were prospectively evaluated. Stones were translocated to a dependent upper pole calix where laser lithotripsy was performed. An attempt was made to clear all fragments using tipless stone baskets. One month after surgery stone clearance was evaluated exclusively with noncontrast spiral CT.
RESULTS: In 58 patients undergoing surgery on protocol, average stone burden was 9.4 +/- 3.4 mm and was significantly smaller in 44 patients with stones in a solitary location (8.5 +/- 2.9 mm) than in 14 patients with stones in multiple locations (12.3 +/- 3.2 mm, p <0.001). Primary stone location was categorized as renal nonlower pole (in 16), renal lower pole (in 19) and proximal ureter (in 23). Average operative time (43.7 +/- 18.4 minutes) was unaffected by stone location or multiplicity after controlling for stone size (p >0.05). Stone clearance rates were not affected by stone location or multiplicity, with overall success rates of 54%, 84% and 95% at fragment thresholds of 0, 2 and 4 mm, respectively (p >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy with active fragment extraction was time efficient and highly effective. Sensitive postoperative imaging reveals the challenge of achieving a true stone-free state. We were unable to demonstrate an impact of stone location on stone-free rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16697818     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00311-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The "old" 15 mm renal stone size limit for RIRS remains a clinically significant threshold size.

Authors:  Hanan Goldberg; Dor Golomb; Yariv Shtabholtz; Shlomi Tapiero; German Creiderman; Avi Shariv; Jack Baniel; David Lifhshitz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors?

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Tuna Mut; Patrick Krombach; Maurice Stephan Michel; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-05

Review 4.  What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones?

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; J Stuart Wolf; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Efficacy of surgical techniques and factors affecting residual stone rate in the treatment of kidney stones.

Authors:  Hüseyin Aydemir; Salih Budak; Şükrü Kumsar; Osman Köse; Hasan Salih Sağlam; Öztuğ Adsan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09

6.  Noninvasive management of obstructing ureteral stones using electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  M C Sighinolfi; S M Chiara; S Micali; M Salvatore; S De Stefani; D S Stefano; G Saredi; A Mofferdin; M Grande; G Bianchi; B Giampaolo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Manoj Monga; Margaret S Pearle; Jodi A Antonelli; Michelle J Semins; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman; Vernon M Pais; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Brian H Eisner; Ojas Shah; Roger L Sur; Patrick W Mufarrij; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Fluoroscopy free flexible ureteroscopy with holmium: Yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for removal of renal calculi.

Authors:  Hamdy Aboutaleb
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-05-19

9.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter.

Authors:  Hemendra Navinchandra Shah
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10

10.  Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi smaller than one centimeter.

Authors:  Christian Chaussy; Thorsten Bergsdorf
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.