| Literature DB >> 25013772 |
Corrado De Vito1, Claudio Angeloni2, Emma De Feo3, Carolina Marzuillo1, Amedeo Lattanzi2, Walter Ricciardi3, Paolo Villari1, Stefania Boccia4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of women who got a Pap-test during the mass media campaign, carried out in an Italian region by broadcasts advertising, and two years later and to identify the determinants of knowledge of cervical cancer etiology and of the adherence to the mass media campaign.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25013772 PMCID: PMC4075131 DOI: 10.1155/2014/304602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Selected demographic and professional characteristics of the women who got the Pap-test during the campaign period (Group 1) and two years later (Group 2).
| Characteristics | Group 1 | Group 2 |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Age, years | 42.5 | 10.9 | 43.9 | 10.7 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
|
| % |
| % | ||
|
| |||||
| Place of residence | |||||
| Urban | 450 | 54.68 | 4079 | 52.65 | 0.268 |
| Rural | 373 | 45.32 | 3668 | 47.35 | |
| Educational level | |||||
| None/primary school | 65 | 8.89 | 978 | 12.71 | 0.009 |
| Middle school | 223 | 30.51 | 2184 | 28.39 | |
| High school | 330 | 45.14 | 3223 | 41.90 | |
| Academic degree | 113 | 15.46 | 1307 | 16.99 | |
| Missing |
|
|
|
| |
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 135 | 19.29 | 1239 | 16.30 | 0.025 |
| Married | 518 | 74.00 | 5662 | 74.49 | |
| Separated/divorced | 27 | 3.86 | 471 | 6.20 | |
| Widow | 20 | 2.86 | 229 | 3.01 | |
| Missing |
|
|
|
| |
| Professional occupation | |||||
| Trader | 27 | 3.76 | 299 | 3.90 | <0.001 |
| Laborer | 101 | 14.05 | 1063 | 13.88 | |
| Employee | 94 | 13.07 | 1240 | 16.19 | |
| Corporate entrepreneur | 10 | 1.39 | 88 | 1.15 | |
| Agricultural entrepreneur | 8 | 1.11 | 134 | 1.75 | |
| Freelancer | 8 | 1.11 | 293 | 3.82 | |
| Teacher | 43 | 5.98 | 548 | 7.15 | |
| Housewife | 237 | 32.96 | 2645 | 34.53 | |
| Retired | 31 | 4.31 | 384 | 5.01 | |
| Craftsman | 1 | 0.14 | 92 | 1.20 | |
| Caregiver | 27 | 3.76 | 239 | 3.12 | |
| Waitress | 14 | 1.95 | 145 | 1.89 | |
| Shop assistant | 10 | 1.39 | 78 | 1.02 | |
| Sanitary | 16 | 2.23 | 71 | 0.93 | |
| Student | 9 | 1.25 | 47 | 0.61 | |
| Unemployed | 28 | 3.89 | 162 | 2.11 | |
| Other | 55 | 7.65 | 132 | 1.73 | |
| Missing |
|
|
|
| |
Knowledge of cervical cancer aetiology and related screening procedure and motivation to get the Pap-test among women who got the Pap-test during the campaign period (Group 1) and two years later (Group 2).
| Characteristics | Group 1 | Group 2 |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | ||
| Reason to get the Pap-test | |||||
| To prevent cervical cancer | 258 | 35.88 | 2902 | 41.80 | <0.001 |
| Invitation letter | 176 | 24.48 | 1942 | 27.97 | |
| Mass media campaign | 86 | 11.95 | 63 | 0.91 | |
| General practitioner/gynaecologist suggestion | 103 | 14.33 | 1139 | 16.41 | |
| Friend suggestion | 27 | 3.76 | 85 | 1.22 | |
| Other | 69 | 9.60 | 811 | 11.69 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Knowledge of cervical cancer aetiology | |||||
| Yes, sexual mode | 104 | 14.31 | 1994 | 27.87 | <0.001 |
| Yes, unknown way | 321 | 44.15 | 2502 | 34.97 | |
| No | 302 | 41.54 | 2659 | 37.16 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Previous Pap-test | |||||
| No | 94 | 11.42 | 695 | 9.00 | 0.023 |
| Yes | 729 | 88.58 | 7023 | 91.00 | |
|
| — | — |
|
| |
Results of the logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of knowledge of cervical cancer aetiology in the entire sample.
| Variable | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Education degree* | 1.97 | 1.83–2.12 | <0.001 |
| Previous treatment after Pap-test | 2.88 | 2.43–3.41 | <0.001 |
| Marital status | 1.30 | 1.12–1.52 | 0.001 |
| Place of residence | 1.21 | 1.11–1.32 | <0.001 |
*Variable modelled as ordinal, since linearity was assessed.
Results of the logistic regression model to identify the characteristics of the women who got the Pap-test as a consequence of the mass media campaign in the entire sample.
| Variable | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.97 | 0.95–0.99 | 0.001 |
| Place of residence | 1.52 | 1.06–2.18 | 0.024 |
| Group source | 8.28 | 5.51–12.45 | <0.001 |
| Knowledge of cervical cancer causes | 0.45 | 0.24–0.84 | 0.012 |