Literature DB >> 9465350

A review of cervical cancer screening intervention research: implications for public health programs and future research.

A C Marcus1, L A Crane.   

Abstract

In this paper we review the published literature with respect to cervical cancer screening intervention research. Mass media campaigns appear to work best in promoting cervical cancer screening when multiple media are used, when they promote specific screening programs that eliminate or reduce access barriers, or when they are used in combination with other strategies. Many positive examples of using outreach staff to promote cervical cancer screening, as well as using mobile examination rooms in the community, were found. Substantial evidence that letters mailed to patient populations are efficacious was found, especially in promoting interval screening; however, bulk mailings to nonpatient populations have generally not been successful. Both physician and patient prompts have shown promise as well as opportunistic screenings in both the outpatient and the inpatient settings. In addition, several strategies for reducing loss to follow-up among women with abnormal test results were identified, including telephone follow-up, educational mailouts, audiovisual programs, clinic-based educational presentations and workshops, transportation incentives, and economic vouchers. Of special note is the success of other countries in establishing centralized recall systems to promote interval screening for cervical cancer. Ultimately, such systems could replace the need for opportunistic screening in underserved populations and perhaps many community outreach efforts. It is argued that health departments represent a logical starting point for developing a network of recall systems in the United States for underserved women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9465350     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  26 in total

Review 1.  Can cultural competency reduce racial and ethnic health disparities? A review and conceptual model.

Authors:  C Brach; I Fraser
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians.

Authors:  J Kathleen Tracy; Alison D Lydecker; Lynda Ireland
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  The development of a brief jail-based cervical health promotion intervention.

Authors:  Megha Ramaswamy; Rebekah Simmons; Patricia J Kelly
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2014-07-25

4.  Effectiveness of a mass media campaign to recruit young adults for testing of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of home obtained and mailed samples.

Authors:  B Andersen; L Østergaard; J K Møller; F Olesen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 5.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Rebecca Anhang Price; Caroline Cranos; Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

6.  Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Alicia Gonzales; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Janet Williams; Monica Saavedra-Embesi; Wenyaw Chan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A theory-based approach to understanding follow-up of abnormal Pap tests.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Heidi C Pearson
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2009-04

8.  Effect of health beliefs on delays in care for abnormal cervical cytology in a multi-ethnic population.

Authors:  Karin Nelson; Ann M Geiger; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Cost of services provided by the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; Sujha Subramanian; Justin G Trogdon; Jacqueline W Miller; Janet E Royalty; Chunyu Li; Gery P Guy; Wesley Crouse; Hope Thompson; James G Gardner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Ethics and Community Involvement in Syntheses Concerning American Indian, Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew O Gribble; Deana M Around Him
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2014-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.