Literature DB >> 18615871

Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study.

S Shiloh1, L Koehly, J Jenkins, J Martin, D Hadley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The emotional effects of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) provided within a counseling program were assessed among 253 individuals.
METHODS: Assessments were scheduled at baseline before testing, and again after 6 and 12 months post-test. Negative emotional reactions were evaluated using the Revised Impact of Event Scale and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale. Monitoring coping style was assessed at baseline using the Miller Behavioral Style Scale.
RESULTS: Mean reductions were indicated in distress and depression levels within the first 6 months after counseling and testing. High monitors were generally more distressed than low monitors, specifically if they had indeterminate or positive results.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic counseling and testing for HNPCC do not result in long-term distress for most people. Of the variables investigated, only time and coping style have main effects on emotional reactions, and the impacts of mutation status are moderated by coping style. Psychological interventions, aimed to alleviate adverse emotional effects, were suggested for certain participants, i.e. recipients of positive or indeterminate results who are high monitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18615871     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  21 in total

1.  Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-24

2.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Colonoscopy use following mutation detection in Lynch syndrome: exploring a role for cancer screening in adaptation.

Authors:  D W Hadley; S Ashida; J F Jenkins; K A Calzone; I R Kirsch; L M Koehly
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-02

Review 5.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Colon cancer screening practices and disclosure after receipt of positive or inconclusive genetic test results for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Can we test for hereditary cancer at 18 years when we start surveillance at 25? Patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Aisha S Sie; Judith B Prins; Liesbeth Spruijt; C Marleen Kets; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Exploring psychological responses to genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome within the family context.

Authors:  Dina Eliezer; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  A survey of genetic counselors about the needs of 18-25 year olds from families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Rachel Ratner; Lindsey M Hoskins; Caroline Lieber
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  David S Weinberg; Eileen Keenan; Karen Ruth; Karthik Devarajan; Michelle Rodoletz; Eric J Bieber
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.