Literature DB >> 1994055

Breast self-examination in relation to the occurrence of advanced breast cancer.

P A Newcomb1, N S Weiss, B E Storer, D Scholes, B E Young, L F Voigt.   

Abstract

Two hundred nine female enrollees of the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound who developed advanced-stage breast cancer during the period 1982-1988 were interviewed about their practice of breast self-examination (BSE), use of other breast cancer screening modalities, and medical and reproductive histories. Each subject's description of how she performed the examination was scored according to her mention of up to 10 recommended BSE techniques. A random sample of 433 women without advanced-stage breast cancer from the same population was interviewed for comparison. Relative to women not practicing BSE, the risk of advanced-stage breast cancer among BSE users was 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.81). Frequency of BSE did not differ between women with advanced-stage breast cancer and control subjects, whether in all subjects or in subgroups defined by age, use of mammography, or frequency of clinical breast examinations. While self-described proficiency in BSE was generally low in both case and control subjects, the small percentage of women reporting more thorough self-examinations, regardless of frequency, had about a 35% decrease in the occurrence of advanced-stage breast cancer compared to women who did not perform BSE. These results suggest that, while carefully performed BSE may avoid the development of some advanced-stage breast cancers, BSE as practiced by most Seattle-area women is of little or no benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1994055     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/83.4.260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  21 in total

Review 1.  Should family physicians be teaching and encouraging women to perform regular breast self-examination?

Authors:  R Heisey; N Pimlott; M F Evans
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Is it time to stop teaching breast self-examination?

Authors:  L Nekhlyudov; S W Fletcher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Breast cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy and health care policies.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Urbain
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Assessment of self-reward strategies for maintenance of breast self-examination.

Authors:  L J Solomon; B S Flynn; J K Worden; R M Mickey; J M Skelly; B M Geller; N W Peluso; J A Webster
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-02

5.  No Association Between Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Reduced Cancer-Related Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Andrew M Moon; Noel S Weiss; Lauren A Beste; Feng Su; Samuel B Ho; Ga-Young Jin; Elliott Lowy; Kristin Berry; George N Ioannou
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  How compliant is compliant? Evaluating adherence with breast self-exam positions.

Authors:  V M Stevens; J W Hatcher; B K Bruce
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-10

7.  Effect of breast self-examination techniques on the risk of death from breast cancer.

Authors:  B J Harvey; A B Miller; C J Baines; P N Corey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Is breast self-examination still necessary?

Authors:  T G Hislop
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The practice of breast self-examination results in the earlier detection and better clinical course of Japanese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Kurebayashi; K Shimozuma; H Sonoo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  A brief intervention designed to increase breast cancer self-screening.

Authors:  Nangel M Lindberg; Victor J Stevens; K Sabina Smith; Russell E Glasgow; Deborah J Toobert
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2009 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.