Literature DB >> 30287899

Presymptomatic genetic testing for hereditary cancer in young adults: a survey of young adults and parents.

Lea Godino1,2, Daniela Turchetti3, Leigh Jackson4, Catherine Hennessy5, Heather Skirton4.   

Abstract

Presymptomatic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes should involve a considered choice. This may be particularly challenging when testing is undertaken in early adulthood. With the aim of exploring the psychosocial implications of presymptomatic testing for hereditary cancer in young adults and their parents, a cross-sectional survey was designed. Two questionnaires were developed (one for young adults who had considered presymptomatic testing, one for parents). Questionnaires were completed by 152 (65.2%) young adults and 42 (73.7%) parents. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, inferential testing, and exploratory factor analysis and linear regression analysis. Young adults were told about their potential genetic risk at a mean age of 20 years; in most cases, information was given by a parent, often in an unplanned conversation. Although testing requests were usually made by young adults, the majority of parents felt they had control over the young adult's decision and all felt their children should be tested. Results suggest that some young adults did not understand the implications of the genetic test but complied with parental pressure. Counselling approaches for presymptomatic testing may require modification both for young adults and their parents. Those offering testing need to be aware of the complex pressures that young adults can experience, which can influence their autonomous choices. It is therefore important to emphasise to both parents and young adults that, although testing can bring benefits in terms of surveillance and prevention, young adults have a choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30287899      PMCID: PMC6336858          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0262-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  29 in total

1.  Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement.

Authors:  S Shiloh; O Avdor; R M Goodman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1990-12

Review 2.  Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing on young adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lea Godino; Daniela Turchetti; Leigh Jackson; Catherine Hennessy; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Understanding the decision to take the predictive test for Huntington disease.

Authors:  G J Meissen; C A Mastromauro; D K Kiely; D S McNamara; R H Myers
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1991-06-15

4.  Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell.

Authors:  Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Michel Dorval; Lisa S DiGianni; Katherine A Schneider; Anu Chittenden; Judy E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Parents' and children's communication about genetic risk: a qualitative study, learning from families' experiences.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Gill Plumridge; Jane Coad; Andrew Shanks; Paramjit Gill
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Awareness of breast cancer genetics and interest in predictive genetic testing: a survey of a southern Italian population.

Authors:  M Bruno; S Tommasi; B Stea; M Quaranta; F Schittulli; A Mastropasqua; A Distante; L Di Paola; A Paradiso
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Family communication between children and their parents about inherited genetic conditions: a meta-synthesis of the research.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Jane Coad; Gill M Plumridge; Paramjit Gill; Peter Farndon
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family's risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; James J Dignam; Comfort N Ibe; Sogyong L Auh; Fay J Hlubocky; Shelly A Cummings; Melody White; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Barbara M Brogan; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-06
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of support groups for carriers of BRCA 1/2 pathogenic variants and their relatives: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benedetta Bertonazzi; Daniela Turchetti; Lea Godino
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Minors at risk of von Hippel-Lindau disease: 10 years' experience of predictive genetic testing and follow-up adherence.

Authors:  Roseline Vibert; Khadija Lahlou-Laforêt; Maryam Samadi; Valérie Krivosic; Thomas Blanc; Laurence Amar; Nelly Burnichon; Caroline Abadie; Stéphane Richard; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.351

3.  Sudden shift to remote genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of genetics professionals in Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Turchetti; Linda Battistuzzi; Benedetta Bertonazzi; Lea Godino
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.