Literature DB >> 25010584

Attitudes toward self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among primary care attendees living on the US-Mexico border.

Eribeth Penaranda1, Jennifer Molokwu1, Ingrid Hernandez1, Rebekah Salaiz1, Norma Nguyen1, Theresa Byrd1, Navkiran Shokar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hispanic women living along the US border with Mexico have one of the highest cervical cancer mortality rates in the nation, owing in part to lower rates of screening. The barriers to screening in this population include lack of access to care and fear of and embarrassment about the pelvic examination. Screening for oncogenic or high-risk human papillomavirus during cervical cytology has been added to screening recommendations. A novel method for human papillomavirus testing is self-sampling, in which women collect their own cervicovaginal samples. There is lack of information about the acceptability of self-sampling as an alternative to cytology for cervical cancer screening in women living along the US-Mexico border.
METHODS: We conducted five focus groups with women between the ages of 30 and 65 who were primary care patients of clinics along the US-Mexico border. We used constructs from different health behavioral theories as a framework for the interview guide.
RESULTS: A total of 21 women participated in the focus groups, 80% of whom were Hispanic; mean age was 53.4 (standard deviation 7.9). More than one-third (38%) of the participants had not undergone a Papanicolaou test in the last 3 years. Women identified the perceived benefits of self-sampling as ease, convenience, practicability, less embarrassment, and need for child care as compared with a Papanicolaou test. The main barrier to self-sampling was concern about not performing the test correctly.
CONCLUSIONS: In this qualitative study, we found positive attitudes toward self-sampling among women living along the US border with Mexico. Further research is needed to evaluate interventions that address women's low levels of self-efficacy to perform the test and to evaluate the effectiveness of self-sampling in increasing cervical cancer screening rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25010584     DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  9 in total

Review 1.  Variation in Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences among Medically Underserved Individuals in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Meghan C O'Leary; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa P Spees
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Acceptability and ease of use of mailed HPV self-collection among infrequently screened women in North Carolina.

Authors:  Chelsea Anderson; Lindsay Breithaupt; Andrea Des Marais; Charlotte Rastas; Alice Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Avoidable tragedies: Disparities in healthcare access among medically underserved women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lois M Ramondetta; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen M Schmeler; Maria E Daheri; Jessica Gallegos; Michael Scheurer; Jane R Montealegre; Andrea Milbourne; Matthew L Anderson; Charlotte C Sun
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Women's Attitudes Toward Cervicovaginal Self-Sampling for High-Risk HPV Infection on the US-Mexico Border.

Authors:  Eribeth Penaranda; Jennifer Molokwu; Silvia Flores; Theresa Byrd; Louis Brown; Navkiran Shokar
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Evaluation of the Effect of a Promotora-led Educational Intervention on Cervical Cancer and Human Papillomavirus Knowledge Among Predominantly Hispanic Primary Care Patients on the US-Mexico Border.

Authors:  Jennifer Molokwu; Eribeth Penaranda; Silvia Flores; Navkiran K Shokar
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences.

Authors:  Holly Nishimura; Ping Teresa Yeh; Habibat Oguntade; Caitlin E Kennedy; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

Review 7.  The acceptability of vaginal smear self-collection for screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalia Serrano Doratioto Faria Braz; Noely Paula Cristina Lorenzi; Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso; Lana Maria de Aguiar; Edmund Chada Baracat; José Maria Soares-Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.

Authors:  Ingeborg Zehbe; Pamela Wakewich; Amy-Dee King; Kyla Morrisseau; Candace Tuck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Self-collection for HPV-based cervical screening: a qualitative evidence meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Hawa Camara; Ye Zhang; Lise Lafferty; Andrew J Vallely; Rebecca Guy; Angela Kelly-Hanku
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.