Hawa Camara1, Ye Zhang2, Lise Lafferty2,3, Andrew J Vallely2,4, Rebecca Guy2, Angela Kelly-Hanku2,4. 1. Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, UNSW Sydney, Level 6, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. hcamara@kirby.unsw.edu.au. 2. Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, UNSW Sydney, Level 6, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. 3. Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Goodsell Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. 4. Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Homate Street, PO Box 60, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting women worldwide, with 85% of the burden estimated to occur among women in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Recent developments in cervical cancer screening include a novel self-collection method for the detection of oncogenic HPV strains in the collected samples. The purpose of this review is to synthesise qualitative research on self-collection for HPV-based testing for cervical screening and identify strategies to increase acceptability and feasibility in different settings, to alleviate the burden of disease. METHODS: This review includes qualitative studies published between 1986 and 2020. A total of 10 databases were searched between August 2018 and May 2020 to identify qualitative studies focusing on the perspectives and experiences of self-collection for HPV-based cervical screening from the point of view of women, health care workers and other key stakeholders (i.e., policymakers). Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, quality, and framework thematic synthesis findings. The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) was used to synthesize the primary studies. RESULTS: A total of 1889 publications were identified, of which 31 qualitative studies were included. Using an adapted version of SEM, 10 sub-themes were identified and classified under each of the adapted model's constructs: (a) intrapersonal, (b) interpersonal, and (c) health systems/public policy. Some of the themes included under the intrapersonal (or individual) construct include the importance of self-efficacy, and values attributed to self-collection. Under the intrapersonal construct, the findings centre around the use of self-collection and its impact on social relationships. The last construct of health systems focuses on needs to ensure access to self-collection, the need for culturally sensitive programs to improve health literacy, and continuum of care. CONCLUSION: This review presents the global qualitative evidence on self-collection for HPV-based testing and details potential strategies to address socio-cultural and structural barriers and facilitators to the use of self-collection. If addressed during the design of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening testing intervention program, these strategies could significantly increase the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and lead to more effective and sustainable access to cervical screening services for women worldwide.
BACKGROUND:Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting women worldwide, with 85% of the burden estimated to occur among women in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Recent developments in cervical cancer screening include a novel self-collection method for the detection of oncogenic HPV strains in the collected samples. The purpose of this review is to synthesise qualitative research on self-collection for HPV-based testing for cervical screening and identify strategies to increase acceptability and feasibility in different settings, to alleviate the burden of disease. METHODS: This review includes qualitative studies published between 1986 and 2020. A total of 10 databases were searched between August 2018 and May 2020 to identify qualitative studies focusing on the perspectives and experiences of self-collection for HPV-based cervical screening from the point of view of women, health care workers and other key stakeholders (i.e., policymakers). Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, quality, and framework thematic synthesis findings. The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) was used to synthesize the primary studies. RESULTS: A total of 1889 publications were identified, of which 31 qualitative studies were included. Using an adapted version of SEM, 10 sub-themes were identified and classified under each of the adapted model's constructs: (a) intrapersonal, (b) interpersonal, and (c) health systems/public policy. Some of the themes included under the intrapersonal (or individual) construct include the importance of self-efficacy, and values attributed to self-collection. Under the intrapersonal construct, the findings centre around the use of self-collection and its impact on social relationships. The last construct of health systems focuses on needs to ensure access to self-collection, the need for culturally sensitive programs to improve health literacy, and continuum of care. CONCLUSION: This review presents the global qualitative evidence on self-collection for HPV-based testing and details potential strategies to address socio-cultural and structural barriers and facilitators to the use of self-collection. If addressed during the design of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening testing intervention program, these strategies could significantly increase the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and lead to more effective and sustainable access to cervical screening services for women worldwide.
Authors: Lynette A Denny; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Hugo De Vuyst; Jane J Kim; Peter O Adefuye; Laia Alemany; Isaac F Adewole; Olutosin A Awolude; Groesbeck Parham; Silvia de Sanjosé; F Xavier Bosch Journal: Vaccine Date: 2013-12-29 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Sue J Goldie; Lynne Gaffikin; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Amparo Gordillo-Tobar; Carol Levin; Cédric Mahé; Thomas C Wright Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: George Koliopoulos; Victoria N Nyaga; Nancy Santesso; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Reem A Mustafa; Holger Schünemann; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Marc Arbyn Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-08-10
Authors: G S Ogilvie; D M Patrick; M Schulzer; J W Sellors; M Petric; K Chambers; R White; J M FitzGerald Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Patrick Petignat; Daniel L Faltin; Ilan Bruchim; Martin R Tramèr; Eduardo L Franco; François Coutlée Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Marc Arbyn; Elisabete Weiderpass; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Mona Saraiya; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Sulma I Mohammed; Wen Ren; Lisa Flowers; Bartek Rajwa; Carla J Chibwesha; Groesbeck P Parham; Joseph M K Irudayaraj Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-04-05
Authors: Jessica Sormani; Bruno Kenfack; Ania Wisniak; Alida Moukam Datchoua; Sophie Lemoupa Makajio; Nicole C Schmidt; Pierre Vassilakos; Patrick Petignat Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nicola S Creagh; Claire Zammit; Julia Ml Brotherton; Marion Saville; Tracey McDermott; Claire Nightingale; Margaret Kelaher Journal: Womens Health (Lond) Date: 2022 Jan-Dec