Literature DB >> 34348689

Self-collection for HPV-based cervical screening: a qualitative evidence meta-synthesis.

Hawa Camara1, Ye Zhang2, Lise Lafferty2,3, Andrew J Vallely2,4, Rebecca Guy2, Angela Kelly-Hanku2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting women worldwide, with 85% of the burden estimated to occur among women in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Recent developments in cervical cancer screening include a novel self-collection method for the detection of oncogenic HPV strains in the collected samples. The purpose of this review is to synthesise qualitative research on self-collection for HPV-based testing for cervical screening and identify strategies to increase acceptability and feasibility in different settings, to alleviate the burden of disease.
METHODS: This review includes qualitative studies published between 1986 and 2020. A total of 10 databases were searched between August 2018 and May 2020 to identify qualitative studies focusing on the perspectives and experiences of self-collection for HPV-based cervical screening from the point of view of women, health care workers and other key stakeholders (i.e., policymakers). Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, quality, and framework thematic synthesis findings. The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) was used to synthesize the primary studies.
RESULTS: A total of 1889 publications were identified, of which 31 qualitative studies were included. Using an adapted version of SEM, 10 sub-themes were identified and classified under each of the adapted model's constructs: (a) intrapersonal, (b) interpersonal, and (c) health systems/public policy. Some of the themes included under the intrapersonal (or individual) construct include the importance of self-efficacy, and values attributed to self-collection. Under the intrapersonal construct, the findings centre around the use of self-collection and its impact on social relationships. The last construct of health systems focuses on needs to ensure access to self-collection, the need for culturally sensitive programs to improve health literacy, and continuum of care.
CONCLUSION: This review presents the global qualitative evidence on self-collection for HPV-based testing and details potential strategies to address socio-cultural and structural barriers and facilitators to the use of self-collection. If addressed during the design of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening testing intervention program, these strategies could significantly increase the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and lead to more effective and sustainable access to cervical screening services for women worldwide.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Framework synthesis; HPV testing; Qualitative meta-synthesis; Self-collection

Year:  2021        PMID: 34348689     DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11554-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  56 in total

1.  Recommendations for cervical cancer prevention in sub-saharan Africa.

Authors:  Lynette A Denny; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Hugo De Vuyst; Jane J Kim; Peter O Adefuye; Laia Alemany; Isaac F Adewole; Olutosin A Awolude; Groesbeck Parham; Silvia de Sanjosé; F Xavier Bosch
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries.

Authors:  Sue J Goldie; Lynne Gaffikin; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Amparo Gordillo-Tobar; Carol Levin; Cédric Mahé; Thomas C Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.

Authors:  George Koliopoulos; Victoria N Nyaga; Nancy Santesso; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Reem A Mustafa; Holger Schünemann; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-10

Review 4.  Infrastructure requirements for human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Rose Anorlu; Ghislain Sangwa-Lugoma; Lynette A Denny
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of self collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus compared to clinician collected human papillomavirus specimens: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G S Ogilvie; D M Patrick; M Schulzer; J W Sellors; M Petric; K Chambers; R White; J M FitzGerald
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 6.  Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Petignat; Daniel L Faltin; Ilan Bruchim; Martin R Tramèr; Eduardo L Franco; François Coutlée
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Assessing the acceptability of self-sampling for HPV among Haitian immigrant women: CBPR in action.

Authors:  Lindley Barbee; Erin Kobetz; Janelle Menard; Nicole Cook; Jenny Blanco; Betsy Barton; Pascale Auguste; Nathalie McKenzie
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  Update on prevention and screening of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shaniqua L McGraw; Jeanne M Ferrante
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-10

9.  Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Elisabete Weiderpass; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Mona Saraiya; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 26.763

10.  Point-of-care test for cervical cancer in LMICs.

Authors:  Sulma I Mohammed; Wen Ren; Lisa Flowers; Bartek Rajwa; Carla J Chibwesha; Groesbeck P Parham; Joseph M K Irudayaraj
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Willingness to Self-Collect a Sample for HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in a Well-Screened Cohort: HPV FOCAL Survey Results.

Authors:  Anne Lesack; Laurie W Smith; C Sarai Racey; Lovedeep Gondara; Mel Krajden; Marette Lee; Ruth Elwood Martin; Gavin Stuart; Stuart Peacock; Eduardo L Franco; Dirk van Niekerk; Gina S Ogilvie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Exploring Factors Associated with Patients Who Prefer Clinician-Sampling to HPV Self-Sampling: A Study Conducted in a Low-Resource Setting.

Authors:  Jessica Sormani; Bruno Kenfack; Ania Wisniak; Alida Moukam Datchoua; Sophie Lemoupa Makajio; Nicole C Schmidt; Pierre Vassilakos; Patrick Petignat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The experience of under-screened and never-screened participants using clinician-supported self-collection cervical screening within the Australian National Cervical Screening Program.

Authors:  Nicola S Creagh; Claire Zammit; Julia Ml Brotherton; Marion Saville; Tracey McDermott; Claire Nightingale; Margaret Kelaher
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.