Literature DB >> 26498912

Avoidable tragedies: Disparities in healthcare access among medically underserved women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Lois M Ramondetta1, Larissa A Meyer2, Kathleen M Schmeler2, Maria E Daheri3, Jessica Gallegos2, Michael Scheurer4, Jane R Montealegre4, Andrea Milbourne2, Matthew L Anderson5, Charlotte C Sun2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to identify barriers including logistical and health belief correlates of late stage presentation of cervical cancer (CxCa) among medically underserved women presenting to a safety net health care system.
METHODS: Women presenting with newly diagnosed CxCa were asked to complete a detailed health belief survey that included questions about barriers to care and their knowledge of CxCa. All information was collected prior to initiating cancer treatment. Comparisons were made among women diagnosed at early stages of disease amendable to surgical treatment (≤IB1) and those diagnosed at a stage requiring local-regional or systemic/palliative treatment (≥IB2).
RESULTS: Among the 138 women, 21.7% were diagnosed with ≤lB1 disease, while 78.3% were diagnosed with ≥IB2 disease. Late-stage diagnosis was associated with a greater number of emergency room (ER) visits (p<.001) and blood transfusions (p<.001) prior to diagnosis. Compared to 88% with ≤lB1 disease, only 53% of patients with ≥IB2 disease had a car (p=.003). Women with ≥IB2 disease were more likely to be without a primary care provider (75.0% vs. 42.3%, p=.001).
CONCLUSION: Access to transportation and lack of a regular primary care provider or a medical home are associated with late-stage of CxCa at diagnosis. Many medically underserved women continue to use the ER as their primary source of health care, and as a result their CxCa is diagnosed in advanced stages, with higher medical costs and lower chances of cure. The lack of Medicaid expansion in Texas may result in a worsening of this situation.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Disparities; Emergency care; Insurance; Safety net

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26498912      PMCID: PMC7418500          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  33 in total

1.  Characteristics and survival of cervical cancer patients managed at adjacent urban public and university medical centers.

Authors:  K Behbakht; N R Abu-Rustum; S Lee; A San Juan; L S Massad
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Should the Emergency Department be society's health safety net?

Authors:  Marcus Ong Eng Hock; Joseph P Ornato; Courtney Cosby; Thomas Franck
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 3.  A systematic review of resilience in the physically ill.

Authors:  Donna E Stewart; Tracy Yuen
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.386

4.  Predictors of health behavior change after an integrative medicine inpatient program.

Authors:  Holger Cramer; Romy Lauche; Susanne Moebus; Andreas Michalsen; Jost Langhorst; Gustav Dobos; Anna Paul
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014

5.  Advanced cervical cancer treatment in Harris County: pilot evaluation of factors that prevent optimal therapy.

Authors:  Lois M Ramondetta; Charlotte Sun; Lisa Hollier; Latasha Jarrett; Jody Folloder; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Alycia Hughes; Anuja Jhingran; Jubilee Brown
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Association of health literacy with adherence to screening mammography guidelines.

Authors:  Ian K Komenaka; Jesse N Nodora; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Maria Elena Martinez; Sonal G Gandhi; Marcia E Bouton; Anne E Klemens; Lauren I Wikholm; Barry D Weiss
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.

Authors:  J B Rotter
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1966

8.  Form C of the MHLC scales: a condition-specific measure of locus of control.

Authors:  K A Wallston; M J Stein; C A Smith
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1994-12

9.  Emergency department pelvic examination and Pap testing: addressing patient misperceptions.

Authors:  Michael S Lyons; Christopher J Lindsell; Alexander T Trott
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Vital signs: cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and screening - United States, 2007-2012.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Cheryll C Thomas; Jessica King; Greta M Massetti; V Paul Doria-Rose; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  15 in total

1.  Long-acting Reversible Contraception Among Homeless Women Veterans With Chronic Health Conditions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lori M Gawron; Andrew Redd; Ying Suo; Warren Pettey; David K Turok; Adi V Gundlapalli
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The Impact of Racial, Geographic, and Socioeconomic Risk Factors on the Development of Advanced-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  T Clark Powell; Sarah E Dilley; Sejong Bae; J Michael Straughn; Kenneth H Kim; Charles A Leath
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Cervical cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Meg Watson; Mona Saraiya; Rhea Harewood; Julie S Townsend; Antoinette M Stroup; Hannah K Weir; Claudia Allemani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Basic social resource needs screening in the gynecologic oncology clinic: a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Anna Louise Beavis; Awa Sanneh; Rebecca L Stone; Margaret Vitale; Kimberly Levinson; Anne F Rositch; Amanda Nickles Fader; Kristin Topel; Ashley Abing; Stephanie L Wethington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Distance from a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A proxy for poor cervical cancer outcomes?

Authors:  David A Barrington; Sarah E Dilley; Emily E Landers; Eric D Thomas; Jonathon D Boone; J Michael Straughn; Gerald McGwin; Charles A Leath
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Hispanic Immigrant Women in Coastal South Carolina.

Authors:  John S Luque; Yelena N Tarasenko; Hong Li; Caroline B Davila; Rachel N Knight; Rosa E Alcantar
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-07-12

7.  Evaluating the urban-rural paradox: The complicated relationship between distance and the receipt of guideline-concordant care among cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Mahesh Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher D Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Wendy R Brewster
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Cancer Stage in American Indians and Alaska Natives Enrolled in Medicaid.

Authors:  Scott V Adams; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Andrew Karnopp; Aasthaa Bansal; Stacey A Cohen; Victoria Warren-Mears; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Reproducibility of vaginal immobilization balloons in situ overnight for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Uma D Goyal; Paras P Mehta; Susan Samreth; John Gloss; Haiyan Cui; Denise Roe; Shona Dougherty
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-05-13

10.  Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers.

Authors:  Liisa Jaakkimainen; Imaan Bayoumi; Richard H Glazier; Kamila Premji; Tara Kiran; Shahriar Khan; Eliot Frymire; Michael E Green
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2021-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.