Literature DB >> 24989402

Deformable segmentation of 3D MR prostate images via distributed discriminative dictionary and ensemble learning.

Yanrong Guo1, Yaozong Gao2, Yeqin Shao1, True Price2, Aytekin Oto3, Dinggang Shen4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Automatic prostate segmentation from MR images is an important task in various clinical applications such as prostate cancer staging and MR-guided radiotherapy planning. However, the large appearance and shape variations of the prostate in MR images make the segmentation problem difficult to solve. Traditional Active Shape/Appearance Model (ASM/AAM) has limited accuracy on this problem, since its basic assumption, i.e., both shape and appearance of the targeted organ follow Gaussian distributions, is invalid in prostate MR images. To this end, the authors propose a sparse dictionary learning method to model the image appearance in a nonparametric fashion and further integrate the appearance model into a deformable segmentation framework for prostate MR segmentation.
METHODS: To drive the deformable model for prostate segmentation, the authors propose nonparametric appearance and shape models. The nonparametric appearance model is based on a novel dictionary learning method, namely distributed discriminative dictionary (DDD) learning, which is able to capture fine distinctions in image appearance. To increase the differential power of traditional dictionary-based classification methods, the authors' DDD learning approach takes three strategies. First, two dictionaries for prostate and nonprostate tissues are built, respectively, using the discriminative features obtained from minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection. Second, linear discriminant analysis is employed as a linear classifier to boost the optimal separation between prostate and nonprostate tissues, based on the representation residuals from sparse representation. Third, to enhance the robustness of the authors' classification method, multiple local dictionaries are learned for local regions along the prostate boundary (each with small appearance variations), instead of learning one global classifier for the entire prostate. These discriminative dictionaries are located on different patches of the prostate surface and trained to adaptively capture the appearance in different prostate zones, thus achieving better local tissue differentiation. For each local region, multiple classifiers are trained based on the randomly selected samples and finally assembled by a specific fusion method. In addition to this nonparametric appearance model, a prostate shape model is learned from the shape statistics using a novel approach, sparse shape composition, which can model nonGaussian distributions of shape variation and regularize the 3D mesh deformation by constraining it within the observed shape subspace.
RESULTS: The proposed method has been evaluated on two datasets consisting of T2-weighted MR prostate images. For the first (internal) dataset, the classification effectiveness of the authors' improved dictionary learning has been validated by comparing it with three other variants of traditional dictionary learning methods. The experimental results show that the authors' method yields a Dice Ratio of 89.1% compared to the manual segmentation, which is more accurate than the three state-of-the-art MR prostate segmentation methods under comparison. For the second dataset, the MICCAI 2012 challenge dataset, the authors' proposed method yields a Dice Ratio of 87.4%, which also achieves better segmentation accuracy than other methods under comparison.
CONCLUSIONS: A new magnetic resonance image prostate segmentation method is proposed based on the combination of deformable model and dictionary learning methods, which achieves more accurate segmentation performance on prostate T2 MR images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24989402      PMCID: PMC4105964          DOI: 10.1118/1.4884224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  31 in total

1.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets.

Authors:  Andy Tsai; Anthony Yezzi; William Wells; Clare Tempany; Dewey Tucker; Ayres Fan; W Eric Grimson; Alan Willsky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE).

Authors:  Thomas Robin Langerak; Uulke A van der Heide; Alexis N T J Kotte; Max A Viergever; Marco van Vulpen; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  A magnetic resonance spectroscopy driven initialization scheme for active shape model based prostate segmentation.

Authors:  Robert Toth; Pallavi Tiwari; Mark Rosen; Galen Reed; John Kurhanewicz; Arjun Kalyanpur; Sona Pungavkar; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Fiona M Fennessy; Junichi Tokuda; Nobuhiko Hata; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study.

Authors:  Philip Blumenfeld; Nobuhiko Hata; Simon DiMaio; Kelly Zou; Steven Haker; Gabor Fichtinger; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Uulke A van der Heide; Irene M Lips; Marco van Vulpen; Marius Staring; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Sparse Algorithms Are Not Stable: A No-Free-Lunch Theorem.

Authors:  C Caramanis; S Mannor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.226

8.  Segmenting lung fields in serial chest radiographs using both population and patient-specific shape statistics.

Authors:  Yonghong Shi; Feihu Qi; Zhong Xue; Kyoko Ito; Hidenori Matsuo; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2006

Review 9.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Steven A Leibel; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Registering histologic and MR images of prostate for image-based cancer detection.

Authors:  Yiqiang Zhan; Yangming Ou; Michael Feldman; John Tomaszeweski; Christos Davatzikos; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Deeply supervised 3D fully convolutional networks with group dilated convolution for automatic MRI prostate segmentation.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Yang Lei; Sibo Tian; Tonghe Wang; Yingzi Liu; Pretesh Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Hui Mao; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Superpixel-Based Segmentation for 3D Prostate MR Images.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tian; Lizhi Liu; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A supervoxel-based segmentation method for prostate MR images.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tian; LiZhi Liu; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-20

5.  Liver segmentation from CT images using a sparse priori statistical shape model (SP-SSM).

Authors:  Xuehu Wang; Yongchang Zheng; Lan Gan; Xuan Wang; Xinting Sang; Xiangfeng Kong; Jie Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.