Literature DB >> 21195016

A magnetic resonance spectroscopy driven initialization scheme for active shape model based prostate segmentation.

Robert Toth1, Pallavi Tiwari, Mark Rosen, Galen Reed, John Kurhanewicz, Arjun Kalyanpur, Sona Pungavkar, Anant Madabhushi.   

Abstract

Segmentation of the prostate boundary on clinical images is useful in a large number of applications including calculation of prostate volume pre- and post-treatment, to detect extra-capsular spread, and for creating patient-specific anatomical models. Manual segmentation of the prostate boundary is, however, time consuming and subject to inter- and intra-reader variability. T2-weighted (T2-w) magnetic resonance (MR) structural imaging (MRI) and MR spectroscopy (MRS) have recently emerged as promising modalities for detection of prostate cancer in vivo. MRS data consists of spectral signals measuring relative metabolic concentrations, and the metavoxels near the prostate have distinct spectral signals from metavoxels outside the prostate. Active Shape Models (ASM's) have become very popular segmentation methods for biomedical imagery. However, ASMs require careful initialization and are extremely sensitive to model initialization. The primary contribution of this paper is a scheme to automatically initialize an ASM for prostate segmentation on endorectal in vivo multi-protocol MRI via automated identification of MR spectra that lie within the prostate. A replicated clustering scheme is employed to distinguish prostatic from extra-prostatic MR spectra in the midgland. The spatial locations of the prostate spectra so identified are used as the initial ROI for a 2D ASM. The midgland initializations are used to define a ROI that is then scaled in 3D to cover the base and apex of the prostate. A multi-feature ASM employing statistical texture features is then used to drive the edge detection instead of just image intensity information alone. Quantitative comparison with another recent ASM initialization method by Cosio showed that our scheme resulted in a superior average segmentation performance on a total of 388 2D MRI sections obtained from 32 3D endorectal in vivo patient studies. Initialization of a 2D ASM via our MRS-based clustering scheme resulted in an average overlap accuracy (true positive ratio) of 0.60, while the scheme of Cosio yielded a corresponding average accuracy of 0.56 over 388 2D MR image sections. During an ASM segmentation, using no initialization resulted in an overlap of 0.53, using the Cosio based methodology resulted in an overlap of 0.60, and using the MRS-based methodology resulted in an overlap of 0.67, with a paired Student's t-test indicating statistical significance to a high degree for all results. We also show that the final ASM segmentation result is highly correlated (as high as 0.90) to the initialization scheme.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21195016      PMCID: PMC3707151          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  43 in total

1.  Object localization and border detection criteria design in edge-based image segmentation: automated learning from examples.

Authors:  M Brejl; M Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Active shape model segmentation with optimal features.

Authors:  Bram van Ginneken; Alejandro F Frangi; Joes J Staal; Bart M ter Haar Romeny; Max A Viergever
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  3-D active appearance models: segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images.

Authors:  Steven C Mitchell; Johan G Bosch; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Rob J van der Geest; Johan H C Reiber; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Prostate boundary segmentation from 3D ultrasound images.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Dónal B Downey; Aaron Fenster; Hanif M Ladak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A coupled global registration and segmentation framework with application to magnetic resonance prostate imagery.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Romeil Sandhu; Gabor Fichtinger; Allen Robert Tannenbaum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Edge-guided boundary delineation in prostate ultrasound images.

Authors:  S D Pathak; V Chalana; D R Haynor; Y Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Relationship between prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen nadir, and biochemical control.

Authors:  Joseph M Kaminski; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Wayne H Pinover; Raj K Mitra; Gerald E Hanks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging.

Authors:  M Zaider; M J Zelefsky; E K Lee; K L Zakian; H I Amols; J Dyke; G Cohen; Y Hu; A K Endi; C Chui; J A Koutcher
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Mark G Swanson; Sarah J Nelson; Daniel B Vigneron
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  In vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 Tesla using a transceive pelvic phased array coil: preliminary results.

Authors:  Hee-Won Kim; David L Buckley; David M Peterson; G Randy Duensing; Jim Caserta; Jeffrey Fitzsimmons; Stephen J Blackband
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  12 in total

1.  CADOnc©: An Integrated Toolkit For Evaluating Radiation Therapy Related Changes In The Prostate Using Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Satish Viswanath; Pallavi Tiwari; Jonathan Chappelow; Robert Toth; John Kurhanewicz; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2011-03

2.  Automated computer-derived prostate volumes from MR imaging data: comparison with radiologist-derived MR imaging and pathologic specimen volumes.

Authors:  Julie C Bulman; Robert Toth; Amish D Patel; B Nicolas Bloch; Colm J McMahon; Long Ngo; Anant Madabhushi; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Concurrent segmentation of the prostate on MRI and CT via linked statistical shape models for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Najeeb Chowdhury; Robert Toth; Jonathan Chappelow; Sung Kim; Sabin Motwani; Salman Punekar; Haibo Lin; Stefan Both; Neha Vapiwala; Stephen Hahn; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Deformable segmentation of 3D MR prostate images via distributed discriminative dictionary and ensemble learning.

Authors:  Yanrong Guo; Yaozong Gao; Yeqin Shao; True Price; Aytekin Oto; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Robert Toth; Wendy van de Ven; Caroline Hoeks; Sjoerd Kerkstra; Bram van Ginneken; Graham Vincent; Gwenael Guillard; Neil Birbeck; Jindang Zhang; Robin Strand; Filip Malmberg; Yangming Ou; Christos Davatzikos; Matthias Kirschner; Florian Jung; Jing Yuan; Wu Qiu; Qinquan Gao; Philip Eddie Edwards; Bianca Maan; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Soumya Ghose; Jhimli Mitra; Jason Dowling; Dean Barratt; Henkjan Huisman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  A Kalman Filtering Perspective for Multiatlas Segmentation.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Liangjia Zhu; Joshua Cates; Rob S MacLeod; Sylvain Bouix; Allen Tannenbaum
Journal:  SIAM J Imaging Sci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.867

7.  A Point Says a Lot: An Interactive Segmentation Method for MR Prostate via One-Point Labeling.

Authors:  Jinquan Sun; Yinghuan Shi; Yang Gao; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Mach Learn Multimodal Interact       Date:  2017-09-07

8.  Superpixel-Based Segmentation for 3D Prostate MR Images.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tian; Lizhi Liu; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  A supervoxel-based segmentation method for prostate MR images.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tian; LiZhi Liu; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-20

10.  Prostate segmentation in MR images using discriminant boundary features.

Authors:  Meijuan Yang; Xuelong Li; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Pingkun Yan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.