PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate image registration methodology for automated re-identification of tumor-suspicious foci from preprocedural MR exams during MR-guided transperineal prostate core biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hierarchical approach for automated registration between planning and intra-procedural T2-weighted prostate MRI was developed and evaluated on the images acquired during 10 consecutive MR-guided biopsies. Registration accuracy was quantified at image-based landmarks and by evaluating spatial overlap for the manually segmented prostate and sub-structures. Registration reliability was evaluated by simulating initial mis-registration and analyzing the convergence behavior. Registration precision was characterized at the planned biopsy targets. RESULTS: The total computation time was compatible with a clinical setting, being at most 2 min. Deformable registration led to a significant improvement in spatial overlap of the prostate and peripheral zone contours compared with both rigid and affine registration. Average in-slice landmark registration error was 1.3 ± 0.5 mm. Experiments simulating initial mis-registration resulted in an estimated average capture range of 6 mm and an average in-slice registration precision of ±0.3 mm. CONCLUSION: Our registration approach requires minimum user interaction and is compatible with the time constraints of our interventional clinical workflow. The initial evaluation shows acceptable accuracy, reliability and consistency of the method.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate image registration methodology for automated re-identification of tumor-suspicious foci from preprocedural MR exams during MR-guided transperineal prostate core biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hierarchical approach for automated registration between planning and intra-procedural T2-weighted prostate MRI was developed and evaluated on the images acquired during 10 consecutive MR-guided biopsies. Registration accuracy was quantified at image-based landmarks and by evaluating spatial overlap for the manually segmented prostate and sub-structures. Registration reliability was evaluated by simulating initial mis-registration and analyzing the convergence behavior. Registration precision was characterized at the planned biopsy targets. RESULTS: The total computation time was compatible with a clinical setting, being at most 2 min. Deformable registration led to a significant improvement in spatial overlap of the prostate and peripheral zone contours compared with both rigid and affine registration. Average in-slice landmark registration error was 1.3 ± 0.5 mm. Experiments simulating initial mis-registration resulted in an estimated average capture range of 6 mm and an average in-slice registration precision of ±0.3 mm. CONCLUSION: Our registration approach requires minimum user interaction and is compatible with the time constraints of our interventional clinical workflow. The initial evaluation shows acceptable accuracy, reliability and consistency of the method.
Authors: N Hata; M Jinzaki; D Kacher; R Cormak; D Gering; A Nabavi; S G Silverman; A V D'Amico; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz; C M Tempany Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Tom W J Scheenen; Emile N J T van Lin; Andries G Visser; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Bharatha; M Hirose; N Hata; S K Warfield; M Ferrant; K H Zou; E Suarez-Santana; J Ruiz-Alzola; A D'Amico; R A Cormack; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz; C M Tempany Journal: Med Phys Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Baris Turkbey; Neil Glossop; Anurag K Singh; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford J Wood Journal: Comput Aided Surg Date: 2008-09
Authors: Kirsten M Pondman; Jurgen J Fütterer; Bennie ten Haken; Leo J Schultze Kool; J Alfred Witjes; Thomas Hambrock; Katarzyna J Macura; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Christian Herz; Kyle MacNeil; Peter A Behringer; Junichi Tokuda; Alireza Mehrtash; Parvin Mousavi; Ron Kikinis; Fiona M Fennessy; Clare M Tempany; Kemal Tuncali; Andriy Fedorov Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Alireza Mehrtash; Mehran Pesteie; Jorden Hetherington; Peter A Behringer; Tina Kapur; William M Wells; Robert Rohling; Andriy Fedorov; Purang Abolmaesumi Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2017-03-03
Authors: Simrin Nagpal; Purang Abolmaesumi; Abtin Rasoulian; Ilker Hacihaliloglu; Tamas Ungi; Jill Osborn; Victoria A Lessoway; John Rudan; Melanie Jaeger; Robert N Rohling; Dan P Borschneck; Parvin Mousavi Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Clare M Tempany; Mark G Vangel Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Lawrence P Panych; Janice Fairhurst; Elmira Hassanzadeh; Ravi T Seethamraju; Clare M Tempany; Stephan E Maier Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Pelin Aksit Ciris; Mukund Balasubramanian; Ravi T Seethamraju; Junichi Tokuda; Jonathan Scalera; Tobias Penzkofer; Fiona M Fennessy; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal; Kemal Tuncali; Robert V Mulkern Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Peter A Behringer; Christian Herz; Tobias Penzkofer; Kemal Tuncali; Clare M Tempany; Andriy Fedorov Journal: Clin Image Based Proced Date: 2016-03-23