Literature DB >> 24988357

The importance of the hook region of the cochlea for bone-conduction hearing.

Namkeun Kim1, Charles R Steele2, Sunil Puria3.   

Abstract

For the most part, the coiled shape of the cochlea has been shown to have only minor importance for air-conducted hearing. It is hypothesized, however, that this coiled shape may play a more significant role for the bone-conducted (BC) route of hearing, through inertial forces exerted by the middle ear and cochlear fluid, and that this can be tested by comparing the results of applying BC stimuli in a variety of different directions. A three-dimensional finite element model of a human middle ear coupled to the inner ear was formulated. BC excitations were simulated by applying rigid-body vibrations normal to the surface of the basilar membrane (BM) at 0.8 (d(1)), 5.8 (d(2)), 15.6 (d(3)), and 33.1 (d(4)) mm from the base of the cochlea, such that relative motions of the fluid within the cochlea produced excitations of the BM. The vibrational direction normal to the BM surface at the base of the cochlea (d(1)) produced the highest BM velocity response across all tested frequencies-higher than an excitation direction normal to the BM surface at the nonbasal locations (d(2)-d(4)), even when the stimulus frequency matched the best frequency for each location. The basal part of the human cochlea features a well-developed hook region, colocated with the cochlear vestibule, that features the largest difference in fluid volume between the scala vestibuli (SV) and scala tympani (ST) found in the cochlea. The proximity of the hook region to the oval and round windows, combined with it having the biggest fluid-volume difference between the SV and ST, is thought to result in a maximization of the pressure difference between the SV and ST for BC stimuli normal to the BM in this region, and consequently a maximization of the resulting BM velocity.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24988357      PMCID: PMC4119269          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  25 in total

1.  Factors contributing to bone conduction: the middle ear.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A comprehensive model of human ear for analysis of implantable hearing devices.

Authors:  Xiangming Zhang; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Inertial bone conduction: symmetric and anti-symmetric components.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Kenji Homma; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-01

4.  A study of the vibration of the basilar membrane in human temporal bone preparations by the use of the Mössbauer effect.

Authors:  T Gundersen; O Skarstein; T Sikkeland
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Basilar membrane motion in a spiral-shaped cochlea.

Authors:  M A Viergever
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance.

Authors:  R Aibara; J T Welsh; S Puria; R L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Feed-forward and feed-backward amplification model from cochlear cytoarchitecture: an interspecies comparison.

Authors:  Yong-Jin Yoon; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Effects of ear-canal pressurization on middle-ear bone- and air-conduction responses.

Authors:  Kenji Homma; Yoshitaka Shimizu; Namkeun Kim; Yu Du; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Sunil Puria; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Superior-semicircular-canal dehiscence: effects of location, shape, and size on sound conduction.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cochlear Surface Preparation in the Adult Mouse.

Authors:  Qiao-Jun Fang; Fan Wu; Renjie Chai; Su-Hua Sha
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  The effects of varying tympanic-membrane material properties on human middle-ear sound transmission in a three-dimensional finite-element model.

Authors:  Kevin N O'Connor; Hongxue Cai; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Re-Examining the Cochlea in Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome: Genotype-Phenotype Correlation.

Authors:  J Pao; F D'Arco; E Clement; S Picariello; G Moonis; C D Robson; A F Juliano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Searching for the Sound of a Cochlear Implant: Evaluation of Different Vocoder Parameters by Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Chadlia Karoui; Chris James; Pascal Barone; David Bakhos; Mathieu Marx; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.