Literature DB >> 19944139

Effects of ear-canal pressurization on middle-ear bone- and air-conduction responses.

Kenji Homma1, Yoshitaka Shimizu, Namkeun Kim, Yu Du, Sunil Puria.   

Abstract

In extremely loud noise environments, it is important to not only protect one's hearing against noise transmitted through the air-conduction (AC) pathway, but also through the bone-conduction (BC) pathways. Much of the energy transmitted through the BC pathways is concentrated in the mid-frequency range around 1.5-2 kHz, which is likely due to the structural resonance of the middle ear. One potential approach for mitigating this mid-frequency BC noise transmission is to introduce a positive or negative static pressure in the ear canal, which is known to reduce BC as well as AC hearing sensitivity. In the present study, middle-ear ossicular velocities at the umbo and stapes were measured using human cadaver temporal bones in response to both BC and AC excitations, while static air pressures of +/-400 mm H(2)O were applied in the ear canal. For the maximum negative pressure of -400 mm H(2)O, mean BC stapes-velocity reductions of about 5-8 dB were observed in the frequency range from 0.8 to 2.5 kHz, with a peak reduction of 8.6(+/-4.7)dB at 1.6 kHz. Finite-element analysis indicates that the peak BC-response reduction tends to be in the mid-frequency range because the middle-ear BC resonance, which is typically around 1.5-2 kHz, is suppressed by the pressure-induced stiffening of the middle-ear structure. The measured data also show that the BC responses are reduced more for negative static pressures than for positive static pressures. This may be attributable to a difference in the distribution of the stiffening among the middle-ear components depending on the polarity of the static pressure. The characteristics of the BC-response reductions are found to be largely consistent with the available psychoacoustic data, and are therefore indicative of the relative importance of the middle-ear mechanism in BC hearing. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19944139      PMCID: PMC4103952          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  18 in total

1.  Influence of ear canal occlusion and static pressure difference on bone conduction thresholds: implications for mechanisms of bone conduction.

Authors:  Hashir Aazh; Brian Moore; Ali Asghar Peyvandi; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  A geometrically nonlinear finite-element model of the cat eardrum.

Authors:  Hanif M Ladak; W Robert J Funnell; Willem F Decraemer; Joris J J Dirckx
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Laser interferometry measurements of middle ear fluid and pressure effects on sound transmission.

Authors:  Rong Z Gan; Chenkai Dai; Mark W Wood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Examination of bone-conducted transmission from sound field excitation measured by thresholds, ear-canal sound pressure, and skull vibrations.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Stefan Stenfelt; Tobias Good; Bo Håkansson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Finite-element analysis of middle-ear pressure effects on static and dynamic behavior of human ear.

Authors:  Xuelin Wang; Tao Cheng; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Middle-ear circuit model parameters based on a population of human ears.

Authors:  Kevin N O'Connor; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of middle ear pressure change on middle ear mechanics.

Authors:  S Murakami; K Gyo; R L Goode
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  The mechanics of the middle-ear at static air pressures: the role of the ossicular joints, the function of the middle-ear muscles and the behaviour of stapedial prostheses.

Authors:  K B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1988

9.  Experimental ossicular fixations and the middle ear's response to sound: evidence for a flexible ossicular chain.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Michael E Ravicz; Saumil N Merchant; William T Peake; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The middle ear inertial component of bone-conduction hearing in man.

Authors:  L E Humes
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb
View more
  10 in total

1.  Inertial bone conduction: symmetric and anti-symmetric components.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Kenji Homma; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-01

2.  The effects of air pressure on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions of lizards.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-09

3.  The importance of the hook region of the cochlea for bone-conduction hearing.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Békésy's contributions to our present understanding of sound conduction to the inner ear.

Authors:  Sunil Puria; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Restoration of middle-ear input in fluid-filled middle ears by controlled introduction of air or a novel air-filled implant.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Wade W Chien; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones During Bone Conduction Stimulation.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; Xiying Guan; Rosemary B Farahmand; Brent F Page; Julie P Merchant; Defne Abur; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-31

Review 7.  Analytical and numerical modeling of the hearing system: Advances towards the assessment of hearing damage.

Authors:  Annalisa De Paolis; Marom Bikson; Jeremy T Nelson; J Alexander de Ru; Mark Packer; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The effect of static ear canal pressure on human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: spectral width as a measure of the intra-cochlear oscillation amplitude.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Bert Maat; Emile de Kleine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-02

Review 9.  Design and optimization of auditory prostheses using the finite element method: a narrative review.

Authors:  Qianli Cheng; Han Yu; Junpei Liu; Qi Zheng; Yanru Bai; Guangjian Ni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

10.  An incus-body driving type piezoelectric middle ear implant design and evaluation in 3D computational model and temporal bone.

Authors:  Houguang Liu; Zhushi Rao; Xinsheng Huang; Gang Cheng; Jiabin Tian; Na Ta
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-06-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.