Literature DB >> 23562774

Superior-semicircular-canal dehiscence: effects of location, shape, and size on sound conduction.

Namkeun Kim1, Charles R Steele, Sunil Puria.   

Abstract

The effects of a superior-semicircular-canal (SSC) dehiscence (SSCD) on hearing sensitivity via the air-conduction (AC) and bone-conduction (BC) pathways were investigated using a three-dimensional finite-element (FE) model of a human middle ear coupled to the inner ear. Dehiscences were modeled by removing a section of the outer bony wall of the SSC and applying a zero-pressure condition to the fluid surface thus exposed. At each frequency, the basilar-membrane velocity, vBM, was separately calculated for AC and BC stimulation, under both pre- and post-dehiscence conditions. Hearing loss was calculated as the difference in the maximum magnitudes of vBM between the pre- and post-dehiscence conditions representing a change in hearing threshold. In this study, BC excitations were simulated by applying rigid-body vibrations to the model along the directions of the (arbitrarily defined) x, y, and z axes of the model. Simulation results are consistent with previous clinical measurements on patients with an SSCD and with results from earlier lumped-element electrical-circuit modeling studies, with the dehiscence decreasing the hearing threshold (i.e., increasing vBM) by about 35 dB for BC excitation at low frequencies, while for AC excitation the dehiscence increases the hearing threshold (i.e., decreases vBM) by about 15 dB. A new finding from this study is that the initial width (defined as the width of the edge of the dehiscence where the flow of the fluid-motion wave from the oval window meets it for the first time) on the vestibular side of the dehiscence has more of an effect on vBM than the area of the dehiscence. Analyses of dehiscence effects using the FE model further predict that changing the direction of the BC excitation should have an effect on vBM, with vBM being about 20 dB lower due to BC excitation parallel to the longitudinal direction of the BM in the hook region (the x direction) as compared to excitations in other directions (y and z). BC excitation in the x direction and with a 'center' dehiscence located midway along the length of the SSC causes a reduction in the anti-symmetric component of the fluid pressure across the BM, as compared to the other directions of BC excitation, which results in a decrease in vBM at high frequencies. This article is part of a special issue entitled "MEMRO 2012".
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23562774      PMCID: PMC4277189          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  Superior canal dehiscence size: multivariate assessment of clinical impact.

Authors:  Wade W Chien; Kristen Janky; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  L B Minor
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

3.  The cochlear amplifier and Ca2+ current-driven active stereocilia motion.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A study of the vibration of the basilar membrane in human temporal bone preparations by the use of the Mössbauer effect.

Authors:  T Gundersen; O Skarstein; T Sikkeland
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance.

Authors:  R Aibara; J T Welsh; S Puria; R L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  L B Minor; D Solomon; J S Zinreich; D S Zee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

7.  Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Sunil Puria; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Jocelyn E Songer; Hideko H Nakajima; Kelly M Brinsko; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Michael J McKenna; Mitchell J Ramsey; John J Rosowski; Barbara S Herrmann; Steven D Rauch; Hugh D Curtin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Semicircular canal fenestration - improvement of bone- but not air-conducted auditory thresholds.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer; Sharon Freeman; Ronen Perez
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  12 in total

1.  Identifying Mechanisms Behind the Tullio Phenomenon: a Computational Study Based on First Principles.

Authors:  Bernhard J Grieser; Leonhard Kleiser; Dominik Obrist
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16

2.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Infrasound transmission in the human ear: Implications for acoustic and vestibular responses of the normal and dehiscent inner ear.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; Salwa F Masud; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The importance of the hook region of the cochlea for bone-conduction hearing.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Superior Canal Dehiscence Similarly Affects Cochlear Pressures in Temporal Bones and Audiograms in Patients.

Authors:  Y Song Cheng; Stefan Raufer; Xiying Guan; Christopher F Halpin; Daniel J Lee; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  A clinically oriented introduction and review on finite element models of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kikidis; Athanasios Bibas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Use of cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Ilson Sepúlveda; Thomas Schmidt; Enrique Platín
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-09-23

9.  A three-dimensional finite-element model of a human dry skull for bone-conduction hearing.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; You Chang; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Cochlear Outer-Hair-Cell Power Generation and Viscous Fluid Loss.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.