Literature DB >> 21190651

Feed-forward and feed-backward amplification model from cochlear cytoarchitecture: an interspecies comparison.

Yong-Jin Yoon1, Charles R Steele, Sunil Puria.   

Abstract

The high sensitivity and wide bandwidth of mammalian hearing are thought to derive from an active process involving the somatic and hair-bundle motility of the thousands of outer hair cells uniquely found in mammalian cochleae. To better understand this, a biophysical three-dimensional cochlear fluid model was developed for gerbil, chinchilla, cat, and human, featuring an active "push-pull" cochlear amplifier mechanism based on the cytoarchitecture of the organ of Corti and using the time-averaged Lagrangian method. Cochlear responses are simulated and compared with in vivo physiological measurements for the basilar membrane (BM) velocity, V(BM), frequency tuning of the BM vibration, and Q₁₀ values representing the sharpness of the cochlear tuning curves. The V(BM) simulation results for gerbil and chinchilla are consistent with in vivo cochlea measurements. Simulated mechanical tuning curves based on maintaining a constant V(BM) value agree with neural-tuning threshold measurements better than those based on a constant displacement value, which implies that the inner hair cells are more sensitive to V(BM) than to BM displacement. The Q₁₀ values of the V(BM) tuning curve agree well with those of cochlear neurons across species, and appear to be related in part to the width of the basilar membrane.
Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21190651      PMCID: PMC3010833          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  52 in total

1.  Effect of outer hair cell piezoelectricity on high-frequency receptor potentials.

Authors:  Alexander A Spector; William E Brownell; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Length of hair cells as a measure of frequency representation in the mammalian inner ear?

Authors:  B J Dannhof; B Roth; V Bruns
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1991-12

3.  Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae.

Authors:  S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Morphology of the unfixed cochlea.

Authors:  R M Edge; B N Evans; M Pearce; C P Richter; X Hu; P Dallos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  A COCHLEAR MODEL USING THE TIME-AVERAGED LAGRANGIAN AND THE PUSH-PULL MECHANISM IN THE ORGAN OF CORTI.

Authors:  Yongjin Yoon; Sunil Puria; Charles R Steele
Journal:  J Mech Mater Struct       Date:  2009-09-05       Impact factor: 1.210

7.  Analysis of cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  W E Brownell; C R Bader; D Bertrand; Y de Ribaupierre
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.

Authors:  C D Geisler; C Sang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  37 in total

1.  Response to a pure tone in a nonlinear mechanical-electrical-acoustical model of the cochlea.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Auditory nerve excitation via a non-traveling wave mode of basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  Stanley Huang; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-28

4.  Disparities in voltage-sensor charge and electromotility imply slow chloride-driven state transitions in the solute carrier SLC26a5.

Authors:  Lei Song; Joseph Santos-Sacchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cytoarchitecture of the mouse organ of corti from base to apex, determined using in situ two-photon imaging.

Authors:  Joris A M Soons; Anthony J Ricci; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-28

6.  Organ of Corti vibration within the intact gerbil cochlea measured by volumetric optical coherence tomography and vibrometry.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Anping Xia; Patrick D Raphael; Sunil Puria; Brian Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Cochlear Frequency Tuning and Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

8.  Experimental and Theoretical Explorations of Traveling Waves and Tuning in the Bushcricket Ear.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Olson; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  The importance of the hook region of the cochlea for bone-conduction hearing.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Microstructures in the organ of Corti help outer hair cells form traveling waves along the cochlear coil.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.