Literature DB >> 35058298

Re-Examining the Cochlea in Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome: Genotype-Phenotype Correlation.

J Pao1, F D'Arco2, E Clement3, S Picariello4,5, G Moonis6, C D Robson7, A F Juliano8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Temporal bone imaging plays an important role in the work-up of branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Previous reports have suggested that the unwound or offset cochlea is a highly characteristic marker for branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Our goals were to examine the prevalence of this finding in a branchio-oto-renal syndrome cohort and analyze genetic-phenotypic associations not previously established.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 38 ears in 19 unrelated individuals with clinically diagnosed branchio-oto-renal syndrome and confirmed mutations in the EYA1 or SIX1 genes. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently reviewed and documented temporal bone imaging findings in 13 categories for each ear. Imaging phenotypes were correlated with genotypes.
RESULTS: There was excellent interrater agreement for all 13 phenotypic categories (κ ≥ 0.80). Of these, 9 categories showed statistically significant differences between patients with EYA1-branchio-oto-renal syndrome and SIX1-branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Cochlear offset was present in 100% of patients with EYA1-branchio-oto-renal syndrome, but in only 1 ear (12.5%) among patients with SIX1-branchio-oto-renal syndrome. A short thorny appearance of the cochlear apical turn was observed in most patients with SIX1-branchio-oto-renal syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: An offset cochlea is associated with the EYA1-branchio-oto-renal syndrome genotype. The SIX1-branchio-oto-renal syndrome genotype is associated with a different cochlear phenotype that almost always is without offset and has a short thorny tip as the apical turn. Therefore, cochlear offset is not a characteristic marker for all patients with branchio-oto-renal syndrome. The lack of a cochlear offset in a patient with clinically suspected branchio-oto-renal syndrome does not exclude the diagnosis and, in fact, may be predictive of the SIX1 genotype.
© 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35058298      PMCID: PMC8985666          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  48 in total

1.  Cochlear hook anatomy: evaluation of the spatial relationship of the basal cochlear duct to middle ear landmarks.

Authors:  K R Stidham; J B Roberson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Eya protein phosphatase activity regulates Six1-Dach-Eya transcriptional effects in mammalian organogenesis.

Authors:  Xue Li; Kenneth A Oghi; Jie Zhang; Anna Krones; Kevin T Bush; Christopher K Glass; Sanjay K Nigam; Aneel K Aggarwal; Richard Maas; David W Rose; Michael G Rosenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  On the anatomy of the 'hook' region of the human cochlea and how it relates to cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Francesca Atturo; Maurizio Barbara; Helge Rask-Andersen
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Effects of Various Trajectories on Tissue Preservation in Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Micro-Computed Tomography and Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging Study.

Authors:  Nadine Schart-Morén; Sumit K Agrawal; Hanif M Ladak; Hao Li; Helge Rask-Andersen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Histopathologic investigation of the dimensions of the cochlear nerve canal in normal temporal bones.

Authors:  Elisabeth Henderson; Abigail Wilkins; Lin Huang; Margaret Kenna; Quinton Gopen
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Establishment of normative cochlear and vestibular measurements to aid in the diagnosis of inner ear malformations.

Authors:  Derk Purcell; Jacob Johnson; Nancy Fischbein; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Biochemical and functional characterization of six SIX1 Branchio-oto-renal syndrome mutations.

Authors:  Aaron N Patrick; Barbara J Schiemann; Kui Yang; Rui Zhao; Heide L Ford
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  SIX1 mutations cause branchio-oto-renal syndrome by disruption of EYA1-SIX1-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Rainer G Ruf; Pin-Xian Xu; Derek Silvius; Edgar A Otto; Frank Beekmann; Ulla T Muerb; Shrawan Kumar; Thomas J Neuhaus; Markus J Kemper; Richard M Raymond; Patrick D Brophy; Jennifer Berkman; Michael Gattas; Valentine Hyland; Eva-Maria Ruf; Charles Schwartz; Eugene H Chang; Richard J H Smith; Constantine A Stratakis; Dominique Weil; Christine Petit; Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Branchio-oto-renal syndrome: detection of EYA1 and SIX1 mutations in five out of six Danish families by combining linkage, MLPA and sequencing analyses.

Authors:  Kirsten Marie Sanggaard; Nanna Dahl Rendtorff; Klaus Wilbrandt Kjaer; Hans Eiberg; Torsten Johnsen; Steen Gimsing; Jørgen Dyrmose; Kristian Otto Nielsen; Kasper Lage; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  The Unwound Cochlea: A Specific Imaging Marker of Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome.

Authors:  A Hsu; N Desai; M J Paldino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.