Literature DB >> 23108781

Continuous decline in incidence of hip fracture: nationwide statistics from Finland between 1970 and 2010.

N Korhonen1, S Niemi, J Parkkari, H Sievänen, M Palvanen, P Kannus.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We determined the current trend in the number and incidence of hip fracture among persons 50 years of age or older in Finland between 1970 and 2010. After a clear rise until the late 1990s, the incidence of hip fracture has continuously declined.
INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are a major public health issue associated with excess morbidity and mortality. We determined the current trend in the number and incidence (per 100,000 persons) of hip fracture among older adults in Finland, an EU country with a well-defined Caucasian population of 5.4 million people.
METHODS: We took into account all persons 50 years of age or older who were admitted to hospitals for primary treatment of hip fracture between 1970 and 2010.
RESULTS: The number of hip fractures rose sharply till the end of 1990s (from 1,857 in 1970 to 7,122 in 1997), but since then, the rise has leveled off (7,594 fractures in 2010). Similarly, the age-adjusted incidence of hip fracture increased until 1997 but declined thereafter. The decline was especially clear in women whose age-adjusted incidence was 515.7 (per 100,000 persons) in 1997 but only 382.6 in 2010. In men, the corresponding incidence was 245.3 in 1997 and 210.7 in 2010. The number of hip fractures will increase 1.8-fold by 2030 even with the current 2010 incidence rates because the size of the 50-year-old or older population is likely to increase sharply in the near future.
CONCLUSIONS: The declining trend in the incidence of hip fracture in Finland has continued through the entire first decade of the new millennium. Reasons for this development are uncertain, but possible explanations include increased average body weight, improved functional ability among elderly Finns, and specific measures to prevent bone loss and reduce the risk of falling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23108781     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2190-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of falls among the elderly.

Authors:  M E Tinetti; M Speechley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people.

Authors:  Pekka Kannus; Harri Sievänen; Mika Palvanen; Teppo Järvinen; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comparing properties of audit data and routinely collected register data in case of performance assessment of hip fracture treatment in Finland.

Authors:  R Sund; I Nurmi-Lüthje; P Lüthje; S Tanninen; A Narinen; I Keskimäki
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  A decreasing trend in fall-related hip fracture incidence in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  E Cassell; A Clapperton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Do both areal BMD and injurious falls explain the higher incidence of fractures in women than in men?

Authors:  Peter Nordström; Fredrik Eklund; Ulf Björnstig; Anna Nordström; Ronny Lorentzon; Harri Sievänen; Yngve Gustafson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  C De Laet; J A Kanis; A Odén; H Johanson; O Johnell; P Delmas; J A Eisman; H Kroger; S Fujiwara; P Garnero; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; P J Meunier; H A P Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Secular decreases in fracture rates 1986-2006 for Manitoba, Canada: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  W D Leslie; M Sadatsafavi; L M Lix; M Azimaee; S Morin; C J Metge; P Caetano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Cardiovascular diseases and risk of hip fracture.

Authors:  Ulf Sennerby; Håkan Melhus; Rolf Gedeborg; Liisa Byberg; Hans Garmo; Anders Ahlbom; Nancy L Pedersen; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995-2004: a population-based study.

Authors:  A Icks; B Haastert; M Wildner; C Becker; G Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The epidemic of hip fractures: are we on the right track?

Authors:  Klaas A Hartholt; Christian Oudshoorn; Stephanie M Zielinski; Paul T P W Burgers; Martien J M Panneman; Ed F van Beeck; Peter Patka; Tischa J M van der Cammen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  32 in total

1.  Comparison of hospitalised trends, treatment cost and health outcomes of fall-related hip fracture for people aged ≥ 65 years living in residential aged care and the community.

Authors:  R Mitchell; B Draper; L Harvey; M Wadolowski; H Brodaty; J Close
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Surgical procedures in femoral neck fractures in Finland: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2011.

Authors:  Markus T Hongisto; Harri Pihlajamäki; Seppo Niemi; Maria Nuotio; Pekka Kannus; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Forecasting the burden of future postmenopausal hip fractures.

Authors:  T K Omsland; J H Magnus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  A benefit-risk assessment of the use of proton pump inhibitors in the elderly.

Authors:  Gwen M C Masclee; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  The incidence of hip fractures in Estonia, 2005-2012.

Authors:  M Jürisson; S Vorobjov; R Kallikorm; M Lember; A Uusküla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Incidence of hip fracture in Rohtak district, North India.

Authors:  D K Dhanwal; R Siwach; V Dixit; A Mithal; K Jameson; C Cooper
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Temporal trends in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S N Morin; L M Lix; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Emerging trends in hospitalisation for fragility fractures in Ireland.

Authors:  M A Kelly; B McGowan; M J McKenna; K Bennett; J J Carey; B Whelan; C Silke
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Falling age-related incidence of hip fractures in women, but not men, in Northern Ireland: 2001-2011.

Authors:  P N Karayiannis; M G McAlinden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Cumulative incidence and treatment of non-simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures in a cohort of one thousand two hundred and fifty patients.

Authors:  Paul T P W Burgers; Stephanie M Zielinski; Adinda K E Mailuhu; Martin J Heetveld; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Gert R Roukema; Peter Patka; Rudolf W Poolman; Esther M M Van Lieshout
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.