Literature DB >> 23196864

Burden of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany: estimations from a disease model.

A Gauthier1, J A Kanis, Y Jiang, K Dreinhöfer, M Martin, J Compston, F Borgström, C Cooper, E McCloskey.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This article describes the adaptation of a model assessing the incidence of osteoporotic fractures and prevalence of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) in Germany.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to estimate the epidemiological burden of PMO in Germany from 2010 to 2020.
METHODS: For each year of the study, the 'incident cohort' (women experiencing a first osteoporotic fracture) was identified and run through a Markov model using 1-year cycles until 2020. Health states were based on the number of fractures (1, 2 or ≥3) and deaths. Although the fracture site was not explicitly accounted for in the model structure, the site (hip, vertebral, non-hip non-vertebral) was tracked for each health state. Transition probabilities reflected the site-specific risk of death and of subsequent fractures. Model inputs included population size and life tables from 1970 to 2020, incidence of fracture and BMD by age in the general population (mean and standard deviation).
RESULTS: In 2010, the number of osteoporotic fractures was estimated at 349,560 in women aged 50 years or more, including 80,177 hip and 48,550 vertebral fractures. By 2020, the population is expected to grow by 13.1 %. As a result, the number of fractures is predicted to increase by 15.2 %. The improvement in life expectancy is predicted to lead to a relatively smaller increase in the number of deaths attributable to fractures (+12.8 %), but also to an increase in the prevalence of women with multiple prior fractures (+25.5 %).
CONCLUSION: The PMO disease model, first developed for Sweden, was adapted to Germany. Due to the ageing of the population, the number of osteoporotic fractures is expected to increase markedly by +15.2 % by 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23196864     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-012-0099-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  10 in total

1.  Forecasting the burden of future postmenopausal hip fractures.

Authors:  T K Omsland; J H Magnus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  [Pathological and metabolic bone diseases: Clinical importance for fracture treatment].

Authors:  R Oheim
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Geriatric trauma care in Germany. On the way to providing better care].

Authors:  D Lüttje; M Gogol
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary hip fracture care model in improving the clinical outcome and the average cost of manpower.

Authors:  T W Lau; C Fang; F Leung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures.

Authors:  N C W Harvey; E V McCloskey; P J Mitchell; B Dawson-Hughes; D D Pierroz; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; C Cooper; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  An Atraumatic Symphysiolysis with a Unilateral Injured Sacroiliac Joint in a Patient with Cushing's Disease: A Loss of Pelvic Stability Related to Ligamentous Insufficiency?

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Faramarz Dehghani; Christoph Josten; Jörg Böhme
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2016-01-20

7.  Association of gastrointestinal events with osteoporosis treatment initiation and treatment compliance in Germany: An observational study.

Authors:  Ankita Modi; Chun-Po Steve Fan; Jackson Tang; Jessica Papadopoulos Weaver; Shiva Sajjan
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2016-06-07

8.  The Incidence of Fractures Among the Adult Population of Germany–an Analysis From 2009 through 2019

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Nike Walter; Christian Pfeifer; Siegmund Lang; Maximilian Kerschbaum; Werner Krutsch; Florian Baumann; Volker Alt
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 8.251

9.  Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stefan Zechmann; Nathalie Scherz; Oliver Reich; Beat Brüngger; Oliver Senn; Thomas Rosemann; Stefan Neuner-Jehle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The three-dimensional bone mass distribution of the posterior pelvic ring and its key role in transsacral screw placement.

Authors:  Darius M Thiesen; Dimitris Ntalos; Josephine Berger-Groch; Andreas Petersik; Bernhard Hofstätter; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Maximilian J Hartel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.