Literature DB >> 24971617

CT chest abdomen pelvis doses in Scotland: has the DRL had its day?

D G Sutton1, S McVey, D Gentle, A J Hince, N MacDonald, S McCallum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article reports on a pilot study designed to collect dose data representative of current CT chest abdomen pelvis (CAP) practice in Scotland, make any immediately obvious interventions and to identify if the current UK diagnostic reference level (DRL) of 940 mGy cm is still appropriate. The aims are to identify if a Scotland-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-based dose audit of a number of CT examinations is likely to have value in terms of optimization of patient doses and to comment on the significance of the results in terms of future optimization strategies.
METHODS: Dose audit of CT CAP examinations at 32 different scanner sites across Scotland using accepted data collection and analysis methods. The minimum sample size was 30.
RESULTS: RESULTS indicate that CT CAP doses are lower than those previously reported (median, 800 mGy cm, 75th percentile 840 mGy cm) but follow a distribution that is not in keeping with the concept of DRLs as presently understood or implemented.
CONCLUSION: There is value in a PACS-based dose audit project to provide serial snapshots of patient doses as optimization efforts take place and to revise current knowledge about CT doses. In our opinion, the results call into question whether DRLs or the concept of "achievable dose" are suitable for devising optimization strategies once a certain degree of optimization has taken place. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The results reported here suggest that it may be time to take a different approach to optimization, concentrating on tools that are more refined than the DRL, which may have become more of a compliance tool than an aid to optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24971617      PMCID: PMC4453148          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  10 in total

1.  Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland.

Authors:  S J Foley; M F McEntee; L A Rainford
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey.

Authors:  Federica Palorini; Daniela Origgi; Claudio Granata; Domenica Matranga; Sergio Salerno
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiological protection and safety in medicine. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1996

4.  Dose reduction in oncological staging multidetector CT: effect of iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  M Karpitschka; D Augart; H-C Becker; M Reiser; A Graser
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Australian diagnostic reference levels for multi detector computed tomography.

Authors:  Anna Hayton; Anthony Wallace; Paul Marks; Keith Edmonds; David Tingey; Peter Johnston
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 1.430

6.  Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans.

Authors:  D J Brenner
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2012-08-22

Review 7.  Challenges in radiation protection of patients for the 21st century.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Radiation dosimetry assessment of routine CT scanning protocols used in Western Australia.

Authors:  Rachael E Moorin; Rene Forsyth; David J Gibson; Richard Fox
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.394

9.  ICRP Publication 105. Radiation protection in medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

Review 10.  Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  E J Hall; D J Brenner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.039

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of diagnostic reference level (DRL) and introduction of acceptable quality dose (AQD).

Authors:  M M Rehani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiation dose from multidetector CT studies in children: results from the first Italian nationwide survey.

Authors:  Claudio Granata; Daniela Origgi; Federica Palorini; Domenica Matranga; Sergio Salerno
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-11-08

3.  Automatic calculation of patient size metrics in computed tomography: What level of computational accuracy do we need?

Authors:  Sandra Sarmento; Bruno Mendes; Margarida Gouvêa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.