Literature DB >> 23089015

Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans.

D J Brenner1.   

Abstract

As computed tomography (CT) is such a superb diagnostic tool and individual CT risks are small, whenever a CT scan is clinically warranted, the CT benefit/risk balance is by far in the patient's favour. However, if a CT scan is not clinically warranted, this balance shifts dramatically. It is likely that at least 25% of CT scans fall into this latter category, in that they could either be replaced with alternative imaging modalities or could be avoided entirely. Use of clinical decision rules for CT usage represents a powerful approach for slowing down the increase in CT usage, because they have the potential to overcome some of the major factors that result in some CT scans being undertaken when they may not be clinically helpful.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23089015     DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann ICRP        ISSN: 0146-6453


  12 in total

1.  High-pitch CT, decreasing need for sedation and its potential side effects: some practical considerations and future directions.

Authors:  Sjirk J Westra
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-12-10

2.  A comparative study of radiation doses between phantom and patients via CT angiography of the intra-/extra-cranial, pulmonary, and abdominal/pelvic arteries.

Authors:  M K A Karim; A Sabarudin; N A Muhammad; K H Ng
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-08-29

3.  CT chest abdomen pelvis doses in Scotland: has the DRL had its day?

Authors:  D G Sutton; S McVey; D Gentle; A J Hince; N MacDonald; S McCallum
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Patient crossover and potentially avoidable repeat computed tomography exams across a health information exchange.

Authors:  Benjamin H Slovis; Tina Lowry; Bradley N Delman; Anton Oscar Beitia; Gilad Kuperman; Charles DiMaggio; Jason S Shapiro
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Analysis of the appropriateness of orthopaedic computed tomography scans as exemplified by lower extremity bones and joints.

Authors:  Tomasz Latos; Paweł Sztwiertnia; Wojciech Wierzchołowski; Jerzy Michał Walecki
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2022-02-07

6.  Significant but reasonable radiation exposure from computed tomography-related medical imaging in the ICU.

Authors:  Benjamin H Slovis; Kaushal H Shah; D Dante Yeh; Raghu Seethala; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Matthias Eikermann; Ali S Raja; Jarone Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06

7.  The communication of the radiation risk from CT in relation to its clinical benefit in the era of personalized medicine: part 2: benefits versus risk of CT.

Authors:  Sjirk J Westra
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

8.  Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for uncomplicated ureteral stone--the STONE score: retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies.

Authors:  Christopher L Moore; Scott Bomann; Brock Daniels; Seth Luty; Annette Molinaro; Dinesh Singh; Cary P Gross
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-03-26

9.  Clinically Unjustified Diagnostic Imaging - a Worrisome Tendency in Today's Medical Practice.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sobiecka; Monika Bekiesińska-Figatowska; Milena Rutkowska; Tomasz Latos; Jerzy Walecki
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-13

10.  Breast cancer causes and treatment: where are we going wrong?

Authors:  Colin B Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2013-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.