Literature DB >> 24970857

Quantitative ultrasound imaging for monitoring in situ high-intensity focused ultrasound exposure.

Goutam Ghoshal1, Jeremy P Kemmerer2, Chandra Karunakaran2, Rami Abuhabsah2, Rita J Miller2, Sandhya Sarwate2, Michael L Oelze3.   

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging is hypothesized to map temperature elevations induced in tissue with high spatial and temporal resolution. To test this hypothesis, QUS techniques were examined to monitor high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposure of tissue. In situ experiments were conducted on mammary adenocarcinoma tumors grown in rats and lesions were formed using a HIFU system. A thermocouple was inserted into the tumor to provide estimates of temperature at one location. Backscattered time-domain waveforms from the tissue during exposure were recorded using a clinical ultrasonic imaging system. Backscatter coefficients were estimated using a reference phantom technique. Two parameters were estimated from the backscatter coefficient (effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC). The changes in the average parameters in the regions corresponding to the HIFU focus over time were correlated to the temperature readings from the thermocouple. The changes in the EAC parameter were consistently correlated to temperature during both heating and cooling of the tumors. The changes in the ESD did not have a consistent trend with temperature. The mean ESD and EAC before exposure were 120 ± 16 μm and 32 ± 3 dB/cm3, respectively, and changed to 144 ± 9 μm and 51 ± 7 dB/cm3, respectively, just before the last HIFU pulse was delivered to the tissue. After the tissue cooled down to 37 °C, the mean ESD and EAC were 126 ± 8 μm and 35 ± 4 dB/cm3, respectively. Peak temperature in the range of 50-60 °C was recorded by a thermocouple placed just behind the tumor. These results suggest that QUS techniques have the potential to be used for non-invasive monitoring of HIFU exposure.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIFU; effective scatterer concentration; effective scatterer diameter; parametric imaging; quantitative ultrasound imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24970857      PMCID: PMC4342119          DOI: 10.1177/0161734614524179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  33 in total

1.  Fundamental limitations of noninvasive temperature imaging by means of ultrasound echo strain estimation.

Authors:  Naomi R Miller; Jeffrey C Bamber; Paul M Meaney
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Perspectives in clinical uses of high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  G T Clement
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Real-time calibration of temperature estimates during radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  T Varghese; M J Daniels
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Temperature dependence of ultrasonic backscattered energy in motion-compensated images.

Authors:  R Martin Arthur; Jason W Trobaugh; William L Straube; Eduardo G Moros
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Two-dimensional temperature estimation using diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  C Simon; P Vanbaren; E S Ebbini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Noninvasive estimation of tissue temperature response to heating fields using diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  R Seip; E S Ebbini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Noninvasive temperature estimation in tissue via ultrasound echo-shifts. Part I. Analytical model.

Authors:  R Maass-Moreno; C A Damianou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dynamic frame selection for in vivo ultrasound temperature estimation during radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Matthew J Daniels; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Roberto J Lavarello; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Clare M C Tempany; Bradley J Quade; Yael Inbar; Tilman Ehrenstein; Asher Shushan; Jonathan T Hindley; Robert D Goldin; Matthias David; Miri Sklair; Jaron Rabinovici
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound Imaging Techniques for Spatiotemporal Characterization of Composition, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Cheri X Deng; Xiaowei Hong; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Quantitative Ultrasound for Monitoring High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment In Vivo.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Chandra Karunakaran; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Noninvasive Quantitative Imaging of Collagen Microstructure in Three-Dimensional Hydrogels Using High-Frequency Ultrasound.

Authors:  Karla P Mercado; María Helguera; Denise C Hocking; Diane Dalecki
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 4.  Imaging-based internal body temperature measurements: The journal Temperature toolbox.

Authors:  Juho Raiko; Kalle Koskensalo; Teija Sainio
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 5.  Thermometry and ablation monitoring with ultrasound.

Authors:  Matthew A Lewis; Robert M Staruch; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 6.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 7.  Quantitative Ultrasound for Nondestructive Characterization of Engineered Tissues and Biomaterials.

Authors:  Diane Dalecki; Karla P Mercado; Denise C Hocking
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.