Literature DB >> 26780790

Quantitative Ultrasound for Monitoring High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment In Vivo.

Goutam Ghoshal, Jeremy P Kemmerer, Chandra Karunakaran, Rita J Miller, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

The success of any minimally invasive treatment procedure can be enhanced significantly if combined with a robust noninvasive imaging modality that can monitor therapy in real time. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging has been widely investigated for monitoring various treatment responses such as chemotherapy, radiation, and thermal therapy. Previously, we demonstrated the feasibility of using spectral-based QUS parameters to monitor high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of in situ tumors in euthanized rats [Ultrasonic Imaging 36(4), 239-255, 2014]. In the present study, we examined the use of spectral-based QUS parameters to monitor HIFU treatment of in vivo rat mammary adenocarcinoma tumors (MAT) where significant tissue motion was present. HIFU was applied to tumors in rats using a single-element transducer. During the off part of the HIFU duty cycle, ultrasound backscatter was recorded from the tumors using a linear array co-aligned with the HIFU focus. A total of 10 rats were treated with HIFU in this study with an additional sham-treated rat. Spectral parameters from the backscatter coefficient, i.e., effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC), were estimated. The changes of each parameter during treatment were compared with a temperature profile recorded by a fine-needle thermocouple inserted into the tumor a few millimeters behind the focus of the HIFU transducer. The mean ESD changed from 121 ±6 to [Formula: see text], and the EAC changed from 33 ±2 to [Formula: see text] during HIFU exposure as the temperature increased on average from 38.7 ±1.0 (°)C to 64.2 ±2.7 (°)C. The changes in ESD and EAC were linearly correlated with the changes in tissue temperature during the treatment. When HIFU was turned off, the ESD increased from 81 ±8 to [Formula: see text] and the EAC dropped from 46 ±3 to 36±2 dB/cm(3) as the temperature decreased from 64.2 ±2.7 (°)C to 45 ±2.7 (°)C. QUS was demonstrated in vivo to track temperature elevations caused by HIFU exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26780790      PMCID: PMC5551400          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2517644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  36 in total

1.  Defining optimal axial and lateral resolution for estimating scatterer properties from volumes using ultrasound backscatter.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Noninvasive estimation of tissue temperature response to heating fields using diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  R Seip; E S Ebbini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Hypoxia-driven immunosuppression: a new reason to use thermal therapy in the treatment of cancer?

Authors:  Chen-Ting Lee; Thomas Mace; Elizabeth A Repasky
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.914

4.  Theoretical estimation of the temperature dependence of backscattered ultrasonic power for noninvasive thermometry.

Authors:  W L Straube; R M Arthur
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  High intensity focused ultrasound in clinical tumor ablation.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Zhou
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10

6.  Ultrasonic assessment of thermal therapy in rat liver.

Authors:  Jeremy P Kemmerer; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Clare M C Tempany; Bradley J Quade; Yael Inbar; Tilman Ehrenstein; Asher Shushan; Jonathan T Hindley; Robert D Goldin; Matthias David; Miri Sklair; Jaron Rabinovici
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.

Authors:  Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Kibo Nam; Yassin Labyed; Goutam Ghoshal; Alexander Haak; Ellora Sen-Gupta; Zhi He; Nathaniel R Hirtz; Rita J Miller; Sandhya Sarwate; Douglas G Simpson; James A Zagzebski; Timothy A Bigelow; Michael Oelze; Timothy J Hall; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Microwave thermal imaging of scanned focused ultrasound heating: phantom results.

Authors:  Paul M Meaney; Tian Zhou; Margaret W Fanning; Shireen D Geimer; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.914

10.  Calibration of ultrasound backscatter temperature imaging for high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment planning.

Authors:  John Civale; Ian Rivens; Gail Ter Haar; Hugh Morris; Constantin Coussios; Peter Friend; Jeffrey Bamber
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.