Literature DB >> 24969948

Effect of femoral neck modularity upon the prosthetic range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Glen A Turley1, Damian R Griffin, Mark A Williams.   

Abstract

In total hip arthroplasty, aseptic loosening and dislocation are associated with not being able to achieve the correct prosthetic component orientation. Femoral neck modularity has been proposed as a solution to this problem by allowing the surgeon to alter either the neck-shaft or version angle of the prosthetic femoral component intra-operatively. A single replicate full factorial design was used to evaluate how effective a modular femoral neck cementless stem was in restoring a healthy prosthetic range of motion in comparison with a leading fixed-neck cementless stem with the standard modular parameters. It was found that, if altered to a large enough degree, femoral neck modularity can increase the amount of prosthetic motion as well as alter its position to where it is required physiologically. However, there is a functional limit to the amount that can be corrected and there is a risk with regard to the surgeon having to select the optimum modular neck before any benefit is realised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969948      PMCID: PMC4102828          DOI: 10.1007/s11517-014-1171-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  43 in total

1.  Fracture of a modular femoral neck after total hip arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Geoffrey Wright; Scott Sporer; Robert Urban; Joshua Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.

Authors:  Hidenobu Miki; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G A Turley; S M Y Ahmed; M A Williams; D R Griffin
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Robert B Bourne; Kory D Charron; Keegan Au; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Adverse tissue reactions in modular exchangeable neck implants: a report of two cases.

Authors:  S Douglas Werner; James V Bono; Sumon Nandi; Daniel M Ward; Carl T Talmo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The influence of contact conditions and micromotions on the fretting behavior of modular titanium alloy taper connections.

Authors:  M Baxmann; S Y Jauch; C Schilling; W Blömer; T M Grupp; M M Morlock
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Modular neck prostheses in DDH patients: 11-year results.

Authors:  Francesco Traina; Marcello De Fine; Enrico Tassinari; Alessandra Sudanese; Pierina Paola Calderoni; Aldo Toni
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales.

Authors:  Alison J Smith; Paul Dieppe; Kelly Vernon; Martyn Porter; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Evaluation of range of motion restriction within the hip joint.

Authors:  Glen A Turley; Mark A Williams; Richard M Wellings; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Validation of the femoral anteversion measurement method used in imageless navigation.

Authors:  Glen A Turley; Shahbaz M Y Ahmed; Mark A Williams; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2012-06-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting long-term wear performance of hard-on-hard bearing couples: effect of cup orientation.

Authors:  S Shankar; K Gowthaman; M S Uddin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  What Factors Are Associated With Neck Fracture in One Commonly Used Bimodular THA Design? A Multicenter, Nationwide Study in Slovenia.

Authors:  Simon Kovač; Blaž Mavčič; Marko Kotnik; Vesna Levašič; Mateja Sirše; Samo Karel Fokter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Widmer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.