Literature DB >> 21922954

Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty.

G A Turley1, S M Y Ahmed, M A Williams, D R Griffin.   

Abstract

Range of motion of the hip joint is a major contributor to dislocation post total hip replacement. Impingement is often treated as a surrogate for dislocation and occurs--prosthetically--when the neck of the femoral component contacts with the rim of the pelvic acetabular cup. This impingement is caused by movement of the leg during activities of daily living. This article analyses hip joint range of motion and its implication for impingement. A systematic literature review was undertaken with the purpose of establishing a range of motion benchmark for total hip replacement. This paper proposes a method by which a three-dimensional range of motion boundary established from the literature can be presented. The nominal boundary is also validated experimentally using a number of configurations of a neutral hip joint coordinate frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21922954     DOI: 10.1177/0954411911409306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  9 in total

1.  Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benjamin Craiovan; Florian Voellner; Michael Worlicek; Hans-Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Soft tissue restricts impingement-free mobility in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Woerner; Markus Weber; Ernst Sendtner; Robert Springorum; Michael Worlicek; Benjamin Craiovan; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Which Safe Zone Is Safe in Total Hip Arthroplasty? The Effect of Bony Impingement.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Frederik von Kunow; Moritz Innmann; Matthias Meyer; Max Thieme; Seth Jerabek; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Effect of femoral neck modularity upon the prosthetic range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Glen A Turley; Damian R Griffin; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Evaluation of range of motion restriction within the hip joint.

Authors:  Glen A Turley; Mark A Williams; Richard M Wellings; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Validation of the femoral anteversion measurement method used in imageless navigation.

Authors:  Glen A Turley; Shahbaz M Y Ahmed; Mark A Williams; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2012-06-08

7.  In Vivo Damage of the Head-Neck Junction in Hard-on-Hard Total Hip Replacements: Effect of Femoral Head Size, Metal Combination, and 12/14 Taper Design.

Authors:  Massimiliano Baleani; Paolo Erani; Barbara Bordini; Federica Zuccheri; Mateusz Kordian Mąkosa; Dalila De Pasquale; Alina Beraudi; Susanna Stea
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Femur First navigation can reduce impingement severity compared to traditional free hand total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arnab Palit; Mark A Williams; Glen A Turley; Tobias Renkawitz; Markus Weber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Christian Merle; Danyal H Nawabi; Sebastian Dendorfer; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.