Literature DB >> 21258951

Modular neck prostheses in DDH patients: 11-year results.

Francesco Traina1, Marcello De Fine, Enrico Tassinari, Alessandra Sudanese, Pierina Paola Calderoni, Aldo Toni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia of the hip is a demanding procedure and usually requires dedicated devices and special surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the described techniques have shown variable outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the 11-year outcomes of an off-the-shelf modular neck prosthesis in dysplastic patients and to evaluate the ability of the modular neck system to adequately restore femoral offset, abductor muscles lever arm and leg length.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 61 modular neck prostheses implanted in 47 patients between June 1995 and March 2004. The preoperative diagnosis was developmental dysplasia of the hip in all cases. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris hip score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities score. The femoral offset, abductor muscles lever arm, height and medialization of the hip center of rotation, and differences in leg length were evaluated on postoperative radiographs. Prosthesis survival was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method considering any reason for revision as failure. The average follow-up was 117.2 months (range 57-162 months).
RESULTS: The cumulative survival at 11 years was 97.5%. One prosthesis failed 5 years after surgery because of a ceramic liner fracture due to an inappropriate obstetric maneuver during labour. At the latest follow-up the mean Harris hip score was 74.7 (range 23-91). Leg length discrepancy was avoided in the majority of cases; femoral offset was almost always restored.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this series support the use of modular neck prostheses as an effective alternative in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. The modularity was very efficient in restoring offset, leg length and maintaining stability with a good mid-long-term follow-up. Unlike other proposed surgical techniques, these good results are achievable by a standard surgical technique and with an off-the-shelf prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21258951     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-010-0018-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  13 in total

1.  Long-term survivorship and complication rate comparison of a cementless modular stem and cementless fixed neck stems for primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  David A Fitch; Cristina Ancarani; Barbara Bordini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What Factors Are Associated With Neck Fracture in One Commonly Used Bimodular THA Design? A Multicenter, Nationwide Study in Slovenia.

Authors:  Simon Kovač; Blaž Mavčič; Marko Kotnik; Vesna Levašič; Mateja Sirše; Samo Karel Fokter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcomes of neck modularity in total hip arthroplasty: an Italian perspective.

Authors:  R Papalia; A Di Martino; A Caldaria; B Zampogna; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-01-23

4.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: comparison between modular short-stem hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Marc Beirer; Patrick Weber; Farhad Mazoochian; Andreas Fottner; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Effect of femoral neck modularity upon the prosthetic range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Glen A Turley; Damian R Griffin; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.

Authors:  Quoqiang Zhang; Stuart B Goodman; William J Maloney; James I Huddleston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Markus A Wimmer; Carol A Pacione; Michel P Laurent; Robert F Murphy; Carson Rider
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hervé Ouanezar; Thomas Jalaguier; Florent Franck; Vincent Pibarot; Hugo Bothorel; Mo Saffarini; Jean-Pierre Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-03

9.  Conventional computed tomography software can be used for accurate pre-operative templating in bipolar hip arthroplasty: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Nobuaki Chinzei; Mitsuaki Noda; Hiroshi Nashiki; Takehiko Matsushita; Atsuyuki Inui; Shinya Hayashi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-06

Review 10.  Total Hip Replacement in Developmental Hip Dysplasia: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  George C Papachristou; Eleni Pappa; Dimitrios Chytas; Panagiotis T Masouros; Vasileios S Nikolaou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.