Literature DB >> 24962860

Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Roy Mashiach1, Vadym Mezhybovsky, Avinoam Nevler, Mordechai Gutman, Amitai Ziv, Marat Khaikin.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the impact of three-dimensional (3D) imaging system on the performance of basic laparoscopic tasks in a test model by novice and experienced surgeons.
DESIGN: Three tasks were performed in a test model by 30 surgeons, 15 experienced surgeons, and 15 with minimal laparoscopic experience. The tasks were performed using 2D and 3D vision systems. DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Canadian Task Force II-1.
SUBJECTS: Fifteen experienced laparoscopic surgeons and fifteen novices with minimal laparoscopic experience. MEASUREMENTS: Performance times were recorded using both two-dimensional and 3D imaging system for each task. MAIN
RESULTS: Performance time for all skills was significantly (P < 0.02) shorter when using 3D imaging system. Performance times were reduced by 18-31% using 3D imaging for all participants. Experienced surgeons performed the tasks faster and showed similar improvement while using 3D imaging system.
CONCLUSION: 3D vision systems allow for significant improvement in performance times of basic laparoscopic tasks in a test model for both inexperienced and advanced laparoscopic surgeons. Experienced surgeons benefit as much as novices from 3D imaging system. This benefit should be weighed against the disadvantages of the 3D vision systems, mainly cost, decreased light, eye strain, headaches, and shorter focal lengths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962860     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3635-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy.

Authors:  M D Mueller; C Camartin; E Dreher; W Hänggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.

Authors:  R Smith; A Day; T Rockall; K Ballard; M Bailey; I Jourdan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Jens Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Vision: Does It Improve Laparoscopic Skills? An Assessment of a 3D Head-Mounted Visualization System.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

5.  Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? A validated assessment.

Authors:  Hitendra R H Patel; Maria-Jose Ribal; Manit Arya; Rohan Nauth-Misir; Jean V Joseph
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

Authors:  O J Wagner; M Hagen; A Kurmann; S Horgan; D Candinas; S A Vorburger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance.

Authors:  D B Jones; J D Brewer; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1996-06

8.  Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems.

Authors:  E M McDougall; J J Soble; J S Wolf; S Y Nakada; O M Elashry; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner.

Authors:  A Pietrabissa; E Scarcello; A Carobbi; F Mosca
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1994-12

10.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  15 in total

1.  Accuracy and inter-operator variability of small bowel length measurement at laparoscopy.

Authors:  Benny Gazer; Danny Rosin; Barak Bar-Zakai; Udi Willenz; Ofer Doron; Mordechai Gutman; Avinoam Nevler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Randomized study of the influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging using a novel 3D head-mounted display (HMS-3000MT) on performance of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M Patrzyk; M Klee; T Stefaniak; C D Heidecke; K Beyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Self-contained image mapping of placental vasculature in 3D ultrasound-guided fetoscopy.

Authors:  Liangjing Yang; Junchen Wang; Takehiro Ando; Akihiro Kubota; Hiromasa Yamashita; Ichiro Sakuma; Toshio Chiba; Etsuko Kobayashi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Randomized controlled trials of simulation-based interventions in Emergency Medicine: a methodological review.

Authors:  Anthony Chauvin; Jennifer Truchot; Aida Bafeta; Dominique Pateron; Patrick Plaisance; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  3D vision and maintenance of stable pneumoperitoneum: a new step in the development of laparoscopic right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Takayuki Kawai; Claire Goumard; Florence Jeune; Shohei Komatsu; Olivier Soubrane; Olivier Scatton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.

Authors:  Hitoshi Harada; Shingo Kanaji; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Masashi Yamamoto; Yoshiko Matsuda; Kimihiro Yamashita; Takeru Matsuda; Taro Oshikiri; Yasuo Sumi; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A secondary learning curve in 3D versus 2D imaging in laparoscopic training of surgical novices.

Authors:  Min Li Kang; Chiew Meng Johnny Wong; Hiangjin Tan; Azri Bohari; Tun Oo Han; Yuen Soon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A comparison of laparoscopic procedures performed by novice medical students using 8K ultra-high-definition/two-dimensional and 2K high-definition/three-dimensional monitors.

Authors:  Tatsuya Shonaka; Chikayoshi Tani; Hiroyoshi Iwata; Masahide Otani; Kimiharu Hasegawa; Naoto Matsuno; Hiroyuki Furukawa; Akitoshi Yoshida; Yasuo Sumi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Impact of Training on Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems on Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Novices: A Prospective Comparative Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; Ana Stoica; Pepa Kaneva; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Laser visual guidance versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Oria Mahmood; Lars Konge; Ebbe Thinggaard; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.