Literature DB >> 16985832

Three-Dimensional (3D) Vision: Does It Improve Laparoscopic Skills? An Assessment of a 3D Head-Mounted Visualization System.

Sam B Bhayani, Gerald L Andriole.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic urologic procedures have become increasingly popular, but their widespread use has been limited by training issues. The use of 3-dimensional (3D) vision might aid in training and performance of laparoscopic tasks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a 3D visual system used by novice laparoscopists. In this prospective, randomized study, 24 novice laparos-copists were evaluated on a validated and standardized laparoscopic task using both 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D visualization systems. The task was performed more rapidly with 3D visualization (108 vs. 127 seconds, P < .05). On subjective evaluations, participants believed the task was easier with the 3D system, and participants preferred the 3D system to the 2D system by a 2:1 margin. 3D visualization improves the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery. Surgeons should consider 3D systems when learning complex laparoscopic surgeries. Further evaluation of operative times and complications is needed in clinical studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16985832      PMCID: PMC1477587     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  5 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy?

Authors:  Jochen Binder; Ronald Bräutigam; Dietger Jonas; Wassilios Bentas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Current trends in urologic laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Corollos S Abdelshehid; Louis Eichel; David Lee; Carlos Uribe; John Boker; Jay Basillote; Elspeth M McDougall; Ralph V Clayman; Howard N Winfield; Inderbir S Gill; Steve Y Nakada; Erdal Erturk; Richard Babayan; Arieh L Shalhav; R Ernest Sosa
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report.

Authors:  R V Clayman; L R Kavoussi; N J Soper; S M Dierks; S Meretyk; M D Darcy; F D Roemer; E D Pingleton; P G Thomson; S R Long
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Complete daVinci versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: cost analysis.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Richard E Link; John M Varkarakis; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of renal neoplasia: evolving toward a laparoscopic standard of care.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Ralph V Clayman; Chandru P Sundaram; Jaime Landman; Gerald Andriole; R Sherburne Figenshau; Arnold Bullock; Steven Brandes; Arieh Shalhav; Elspeth McDougall; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.649

  5 in total
  38 in total

1.  Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.

Authors:  R Smith; A Day; T Rockall; K Ballard; M Bailey; I Jourdan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion.

Authors:  Steven Kim; Audriene May; Heidi Ryan; Adnan Mohsin; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

Authors:  O J Wagner; M Hagen; A Kurmann; S Horgan; D Candinas; S A Vorburger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Does 3-Dimensional (3-D) visualization improve the quality of assistance during robotic radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Rajan Ramanathan; Juan I Martinez Salamanca; Anil Mandhani; Robert A Leung; Sandhya R Rao; Roy Berryhill; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Taner A Usta; Aysel Ozkaynak; Ebru Kovalak; Erdinc Ergul; M Murat Naki; Erdal Kaya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Mona Meral Savran; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Vimalraj Velayutham; David Fuks; Takeo Nomi; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Nader K Francis; Marco Augusto Bonino; Nathan J Curtis; Daniele Amparore; Simone Arolfo; Manuel Barberio; Luigi Boni; Ronit Brodie; Nicole Bouvy; Elisa Cassinotti; Thomas Carus; Enrico Checcucci; Petra Custers; Michele Diana; Marilou Jansen; Joris Jaspers; Gadi Marom; Kota Momose; Beat P Müller-Stich; Kyokazu Nakajima; Felix Nickel; Silvana Perretta; Francesco Porpiglia; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marlies Schijven; Gianfranco Silecchia; Roberto Passera; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Stereoscopic augmented reality for da Vincii™ robotic biliary surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Volonté; Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Joël Spaltenstein; Minoa Jung; Osman Ratib; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-05

10.  Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Konstantinos Votanopoulos; F Charles Brunicardi; John Thornby; Charles F Bellows
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.