Literature DB >> 24951232

Relationships of pediatric anthropometrics for CT protocol selection.

Grace S Phillips1, Arta-Luana Stanescu, Adam M Alessio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determining the optimal CT technique to minimize patient radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic utility requires patient-specific protocols that are based on patient characteristics. This work develops relationships between different anthropometrics and CT image noise to determine appropriate protocol classification schemes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the image noise in 387 CT examinations of pediatric patients (222 boys, 165 girls) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and generated mathematic relationships between image noise and patient lateral and anteroposterior dimensions, age, and weight.
RESULTS: At the chest level, lateral distance (ld) across the body is strongly correlated with weight (ld = 0.23 × weight + 16.77; R(2) = 0.93) and is less well correlated with age (ld = 1.10 × age + 17.13; R(2) = 0.84). Similar trends were found for anteroposterior dimensions and at the abdomen level. Across all studies, when acquisition-specific parameters are factored out of the noise, the log of image noise was highly correlated with lateral distance (R(2) = 0.72) and weight (R(2) = 0.72) and was less correlated with age (R(2) = 0.62). Following first-order relationships of image noise and scanner technique, plots were formed to show techniques that could achieve matched noise across the pediatric population.
CONCLUSION: Patient lateral distance and weight are essentially equally effective metrics to base maximum technique settings for pediatric patient-specific protocols. These metrics can also be used to help categorize appropriate reference levels for CT technique and size-specific dose estimates across the pediatric population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT protocols; anthropometry CT acquisition; pediatric CT; pediatrics; radiation dose; size-specific dose estimation (SSDE)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951232      PMCID: PMC4752334          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

Review 1.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach.

Authors:  John M Boone; Estella M Geraghty; J Anthony Seibert; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.

Authors:  Marilyn J Siegel; Bernhard Schmidt; David Bradley; Christoph Suess; Charles Hildebolt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Comment on the "report of AAPM TG 204: size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations" [report of AAPM TG 204, 2011].

Authors:  Baojun Li; Richard H Behrman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Authors:  Patricia L Kleinman; Keith J Strauss; David Zurakowski; Kevin S Buckley; George A Taylor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Body size of contemporary youth in different parts of the world.

Authors:  H V Meredith
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  1969-10

7.  Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso.

Authors:  Jodie A Christner; Natalie N Braun; Megan C Jacobsen; Rickey E Carter; James M Kofler; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diagnostic reference levels for thorax X-ray examinations of paediatric patients.

Authors:  T Kiljunen; H Järvinen; S Savolainen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Length-based endotracheal tube and emergency equipment in pediatrics.

Authors:  R C Luten; R L Wears; J Broselow; A Zaritsky; T M Barnett; T Lee; A Bailey; R Vally; R Brown; B Rosenthal
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.721

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Does body mass index outperform body weight as a surrogate parameter in the calculation of size-specific dose estimates in adult body CT?

Authors:  Johannes Boos; Rotem S Lanzman; Philipp Heusch; Joel Aissa; Christoph Schleich; Christoph Thomas; Lino M Sawicki; Gerald Antoch; Patric Kröpil
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline on Pediatric 18F-FDG PET/CT for Oncology 1.0.

Authors:  Reza Vali; Adam Alessio; Rene Balza; Lise Borgwardt; Zvi Bar-Sever; Michael Czachowski; Nina Jehanno; Lars Kurch; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Marguerite Parisi; Arnoldo Piccardo; Victor Seghers; Barry L Shulkin; Pietro Zucchetta; Ruth Lim
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.082

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.