Literature DB >> 23091173

Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso.

Jodie A Christner1, Natalie N Braun, Megan C Jacobsen, Rickey E Carter, James M Kofler, Cynthia H McCollough.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine relationships among patient size, scanner radiation output, and size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) for adults who underwent computed tomography (CT) of the torso.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was waived for this institutional review board-approved study of existing data from 545 adult patients (322 men, 223 women) who underwent clinically indicated CT of the torso between April 1, 2007, and May 13, 2007. Automatic exposure control was used to adjust scanner output for each patient according to the measured CT attenuation. The volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) was used with measurements of patient size (anterioposterior plus lateral dimensions) and the conversion factors from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 to determine SSDE. Linear regression models were used to assess the dependence of CTDI(vol) and SSDE on patient size.
RESULTS: Patient sizes ranged from 42 to 84 cm. In this range,CTDI(vol) was significantly correlated with size (slope = 0.34 mGy/cm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.37 mGy/cm; R(2) = 0.48; P < .001), but SSDE was independent of size (slope = 0.02 mGy/cm; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.07 mGy/cm; R(2) = 0.003; P = .3). These R(2) values indicated that patient size explained 48% of the observed variability in CTDI(vol) but less than 1% of the observed variability in SSDE. The regression of CTDI(vol) versus patient size demonstrated that, in the 42-84-cm range, CTDI(vol) varied from 12 to 26 mGy. However, use of the evaluated automatic exposure control system to adjust scanner output for patient size resulted in SSDE values that were independent of size.
CONCLUSION: For the evaluated automatic exposure control system,CTDI(vol) (scanner output) increased linearly with patient size; however, patient dose (as indicated by SSDE) was independent of size. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23091173     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  58 in total

1.  Automated tube voltage selection for radiation dose and contrast medium reduction at coronary CT angiography using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Zachary B Poole; Christian Canstein; Akos Varga-Szemes; Damiano Caruso; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiation dose reduction in pediatric cardiac computed tomography: experience from a tertiary medical center.

Authors:  Brian B Ghoshhajra; Ashley M Lee; Leif-Christopher Engel; Csilla Celeng; Mannudeep K Kalra; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann; Sjirk J Westra; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Relationships of pediatric anthropometrics for CT protocol selection.

Authors:  Grace S Phillips; Arta-Luana Stanescu; Adam M Alessio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  How accurate is size-specific dose estimate in pediatric body CT examinations?

Authors:  Boaz Karmazyn; Huisi Ai; Paul Klahr; Fangqian Ouyang; S Gregory Jennings
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-06

5.  Tuning of automatic exposure control strength in lumbar spine CT.

Authors:  A D'Hondt; A Cornil; P Bohy; V De Maertelaer; P A Gevenois; D Tack
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  X-ray examination dose surveys: how accurate are my results?

Authors:  Stephen Taylor; Alain Van Muylem; Nigel Howarth; Pierre Alain Gevenois; Denis Tack
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Feasibility of low-dose CT with spectral shaping and third-generation iterative reconstruction in evaluating interstitial lung diseases associated with connective tissue disease: an intra-individual comparison study.

Authors:  Xiaoli Xu; Xin Sui; Lan Song; Yao Huang; Yingqian Ge; Zhengyu Jin; Wei Song
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Lung cancer screening with ultra-low dose CT using full iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Masayo Fujita; Toru Higaki; Yoshikazu Awaya; Toshio Nakanishi; Yuko Nakamura; Fuminari Tatsugami; Yasutaka Baba; Makoto Iida; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Radiation dose and image quality in intraoperative CT (iCT) angiography of the brain with stereotactic head frames.

Authors:  Robert Forbrig; Lucas L Geyer; Robert Stahl; Jun Thorsteinsdottir; Christian Schichor; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Maximilian Patzig; Moriz Herzberg; Thomas Liebig; Franziska Dorn; Christoph G Trumm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Long Jiang Zhang; Yining Wang; U Joseph Schoepf; Felix G Meinel; Richard R Bayer; Li Qi; Jian Cao; Chang Sheng Zhou; Yan E Zhao; Xie Li; Jian Bin Gong; Zhengyu Jin; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.