Literature DB >> 29874542

Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.

Michelle M Mello1, Van Lieou1, Steven N Goodman1.   

Abstract

Background Sharing of participant-level clinical trial data has potential benefits, but concerns about potential harms to research participants have led some pharmaceutical sponsors and investigators to urge caution. Little is known about clinical trial participants' perceptions of the risks of data sharing. Methods We conducted a structured survey of 771 current and recent participants from a diverse sample of clinical trials at three academic medical centers in the United States. Surveys were distributed by mail (350 completed surveys) and in clinic waiting rooms (421 completed surveys) (overall response rate, 79%). Results Less than 8% of respondents felt that the potential negative consequences of data sharing outweighed the benefits. A total of 93% were very or somewhat likely to allow their own data to be shared with university scientists, and 82% were very or somewhat likely to share with scientists in for-profit companies. Willingness to share data did not vary appreciably with the purpose for which the data would be used, with the exception that fewer participants were willing to share their data for use in litigation. The respondents' greatest concerns were that data sharing might make others less willing to enroll in clinical trials (37% very or somewhat concerned), that data would be used for marketing purposes (34%), or that data could be stolen (30%). Less concern was expressed about discrimination (22%) and exploitation of data for profit (20%). Conclusions In our study, few clinical trial participants had strong concerns about the risks of data sharing. Provided that adequate security safeguards were in place, most participants were willing to share their data for a wide range of uses. (Funded by the Greenwall Foundation.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29874542      PMCID: PMC6057615          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1713258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  53 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Participant-level data and the new frontier in trial transparency.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Preparing for responsible sharing of clinical trial data.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Jeffrey K Francer; Marc Wilenzick; Patricia Teden; Barbara E Bierer; Mark Barnes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Access to patient-level trial data--a boon to drug developers.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Eichler; Frank Pétavy; Francesco Pignatti; Guido Rasi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Sharing of clinical trial data: benefits, risks, and uniform principles.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblatt; Sachin H Jain; Matthew Cahill
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Flora Or; William W Eaton; Nicholas Ialongo
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-20

7.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Open clinical trial data for all? A view from regulators.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Eichler; Eric Abadie; Alasdair Breckenridge; Hubert Leufkens; Guido Rasi
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Vinay Rathi; Kristina Dzara; Cary P Gross; Iain Hrynaszkiewicz; Steven Joffe; Harlan M Krumholz; Kelly M Strait; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-11-20

10.  Sharing individual level data from observational studies and clinical trials: a perspective from NHLBI.

Authors:  Sean A Coady; Elizabeth Wagner
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  52 in total

1.  Clinical trials in radiology and data sharing: results from a survey of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) research committee.

Authors:  Maria Bosserdt; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Characteristics of available studies and dissemination of research using major clinical data sharing platforms.

Authors:  Enrique Vazquez; Henri Gouraud; Florian Naudet; Cary P Gross; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross; Joshua D Wallach
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 3.  Leveraging external data in the design and analysis of clinical trials in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Rifaquat Rahman; Steffen Ventz; Jon McDunn; Bill Louv; Irmarie Reyes-Rivera; Mei-Yin C Polley; Fahar Merchant; Lauren E Abrey; Joshua E Allen; Laura K Aguilar; Estuardo Aguilar-Cordova; David Arons; Kirk Tanner; Stephen Bagley; Mustafa Khasraw; Timothy Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Brian M Alexander; Lorenzo Trippa
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Survey of Investigators About Sharing Human Research Data in the Neurosciences.

Authors:  Saskia Hendriks; Khara M Ramos; Christine Grady
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 11.800

5.  Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why.

Authors:  Consuelo H Wilkins; Brandy M Mapes; Rebecca N Jerome; Victoria Villalta-Gil; Jill M Pulley; Paul A Harris
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing.

Authors:  Jessica Mozersky; Meredith Parsons; Heidi Walsh; Kari Baldwin; Tristan McIntosh; James M DuBois
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2020-03

7.  Enabling realistic health data re-identification risk assessment through adversarial modeling.

Authors:  Weiyi Xia; Yongtai Liu; Zhiyu Wan; Yevgeniy Vorobeychik; Murat Kantacioglu; Steve Nyemba; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Improving the precision of intranasal oxytocin research.

Authors:  Adriano Winterton; Lars T Westlye; Nils Eiel Steen; Ole A Andreassen; Daniel S Quintana
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-11-30

Review 9.  Privacy in the age of medical big data.

Authors:  W Nicholson Price; I Glenn Cohen
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 87.241

Review 10.  Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research.

Authors:  James Brian Byrd; Anna C Greene; Deepashree Venkatesh Prasad; Xiaoqian Jiang; Casey S Greene
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.