Literature DB >> 21976456

Qualitative assessment of study materials and communication strategies used in studies that include DNA collection.

Mary M Jenkins1, Erika Reed-Gross, Wanda D Barfield, Christine E Prue, Margaret L Gallagher, Sonja A Rasmussen, Margaret A Honein.   

Abstract

To understand motivations and barriers to participation in studies that include DNA collection, focus group discussions were held with mothers who had participated in a case-control study of birth defects. Recruited mothers had completed an interview and had received a mailed kit containing cytobrushes to collect buccal cells for DNA from herself, her infant, and her infant's father. Six moderator-led focus groups were attended by a total of 38 women residing in Atlanta, Georgia. Focus groups were segmented by DNA collection status (biologics participants or nonparticipants), infant case-control status, infant birthweight, and maternal race and ethnicity. This report assesses maternal attitudes toward study materials and communication strategies. Across groups, respondents expressed concern about how their contact information was obtained. Study materials were described as clear and professional by most women, although some respondents reported confusion about disclosure of individual genetic results. Respondents generally reported that monetary incentives were not a motivation to participate, but increased perceived study legitimacy. Biologics nonparticipants expressed concerns about kit component sterility; government involvement; and DNA sample use, storage, and disposal. Respondents suggested that investigators provide feedback on whether sample collection was performed correctly and provide materials targeted to fathers to help alleviate paternal skepticism. Participation in DNA collection might be improved by strengthening study materials and communication strategies. Published 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21976456     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  8 in total

Review 1.  The National Birth Defects Prevention Study: A review of the methods.

Authors:  Jennita Reefhuis; Suzanne M Gilboa; Marlene Anderka; Marilyn L Browne; Marcia L Feldkamp; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mary M Jenkins; Peter H Langlois; Kimberly B Newsome; Andrew F Olshan; Paul A Romitti; Stuart K Shapira; Gary M Shaw; Sarah C Tinker; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-06-02

2.  Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Flora Or; William W Eaton; Nicholas Ialongo
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-20

3.  Learning from Latino voices: Focus Groups' Insights on Participation in Genetic Research.

Authors:  Priscilla Martinez; Cory Cummings; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Karen G Chartier
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2017-04-04

4.  Challenges in Studying Modifiable Risk Factors for Birth Defects.

Authors:  Sarah C Tinker; Suzanne Gilboa; Jennita Reefhuis; Mary M Jenkins; Marcy Schaeffer; Cynthia A Moore
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-03

5.  Survey of motivation to participate in a birth cohort.

Authors:  Midori Yamamoto; Misuzu Fujita; Chisato Mori; Akira Hata
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Factors affecting maternal participation in the genetic component of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study-United States, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Jill Glidewell; Jennita Reefhuis; Sonja A Rasmussen; Alison Woomert; Charlotte Hobbs; Paul A Romitti; Krista S Crider
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Analysis of motivations that lead women to participate (or not) in a newborn cohort study.

Authors:  Liza Vecchi Brumatti; Marcella Montico; Stefano Russian; Veronica Tognin; Maura Bin; Fabio Barbone; Patrizia Volpi; Luca Ronfani
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  The role of race and ethnicity in views toward and participation in genetic studies and precision medicine research in the United States: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Authors:  Elena R Fisher; Rebekah Pratt; Riley Esch; Megan Kocher; Katie Wilson; Whiwon Lee; Heather A Zierhut
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.183

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.