Literature DB >> 24947977

3.0 Tesla MRI in the early evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve neurological complications after mandibular third molar extraction: a prospective study.

M Cassetta1, N Pranno, F Barchetti, V Sorrentino, L Lo Mele.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of 3.0 T MRI in the prognosis of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) sensory disorders after mandibular third molar extraction, in the early post-operative period.
METHODS: 343 IANs were examined before and 3 days after surgery. Two radiologists evaluated the course of the nerve and the relative signal intensity (RSI). Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to evaluate the interobserver (k = 0.891) and intra-observer variability (ICC = 0.927; 0.914, respectively). The IANs were divided into four groups on the basis of neurosensory disorders recovery time. ANOVA was used to evaluate the differences among the RSIs of the four groups, and multiple comparisons were performed with Tukey's range test.
RESULTS: No differences in the course of IANs were found before and after surgery. In 280 IANs, no iatrogenic paraesthesia was found (Group A). 63 IANs showed a neurosensory impairment. 38 IANs showed recovery of post-operative paraesthesia at 3-month follow-up (Group B). 16 IANs showed a full recovery of iatrogenic paraesthesia at 6-month follow-up (Group C). Seven IANs displayed a full recovery at 12-month follow-up and two IANs showed persistence of neurosensory disorders at 18-month follow-up (Group D). The one-way ANOVA results indicated statistically significant difference among all groups (p < 0.05), except between Groups C and D (p = 0.504).
CONCLUSIONS: The early evaluation of RSI values represents a valid tool to determine the prognosis of IAN sensory disorders after mandibular third molar extraction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inferior alveolar nerve; magnetic resonance imaging; oral surgery; third molar; trigeminal nerve injuries

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947977      PMCID: PMC4170850          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  34 in total

1.  Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.

Authors:  Giuseppe Monaco; Marco Montevecchi; Giulio Alessandri Bonetti; Maria Rosaria Antonella Gatto; Luigi Checchi
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  High-resolution dental magnetic resonance imaging of inferior alveolar nerve responses to the extraction of third molars.

Authors:  B Kress; A Gottschalk; L Anders; C Stippich; F Palm; W Bähren; K Sartor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The incidence of altered sensation of the mental nerve after mandibular implant placement.

Authors:  R Bartling; K Freeman; R A Kraut
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty.

Authors:  Srinivas M Susarla; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study.

Authors:  Michele Cassetta; Luigi Vito Stefanelli; Andrea Pacifici; Luciano Pacifici; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.932

6.  Panoramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar extraction.

Authors:  Bart F Blaeser; Meredith A August; R Bruce Donoff; Leonard B Kaban; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures.

Authors:  D P Kipp; B H Goldstein; W W Weiss
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 8.  Sensory nerve impairment following mandibular third molar surgery.

Authors:  A B Bataineh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  High resolution 3-T MR imaging in the evaluation of the trigeminal nerve course.

Authors:  M Cassetta; N Pranno; V Pompa; F Barchetti; G Pompa
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.507

10.  High resolution 3-T MR imaging in the evaluation of the facial nerve course.

Authors:  M Cassetta; F Barchetti; N Pranno; G Barchetti; C Fioravanti; A Stagnitti; A Rubini; E Fioravanti; E Saccoliti; D Elia; M Rossignuolo; Claudio Russo; V Cantisani; V D'Andrea
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb
View more
  5 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve using 3T MRI: a study for quantitative evaluation and fibre tracking.

Authors:  Shinya Kotaki; Junichiro Sakamoto; Kornkamol Kretapirom; Ngamsom Supak; Yasunori Sumi; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Assessment of impacted and partially impacted lower third molars with panoramic radiography compared to MRI-a proof of principle study.

Authors:  Barbara Kirnbauer; Norbert Jakse; Petra Rugani; Michael Schwaiger; Marton Magyar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study.

Authors:  Michele Cassetta; Nicola Pranno; Alessandro Stasolla; Nicola Orsogna; Davide Fierro; Costanza Cavallini; Vito Cantisani
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Visualization techniques of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN): a narrative review.

Authors:  Annelies Weckx; Jimoh Olubanwo Agbaje; Yi Sun; Reinhilde Jacobs; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  A systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance neurography versus clinical neurosensory assessment for post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy in patients reporting neurosensory disturbance.

Authors:  Frederic Van der Cruyssen; Frederik Peeters; Tomas-Marijn Croonenborghs; Jasper Fransen; Tara Renton; Constantinus Politis; Jan Casselman; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.419

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.