Barbara Kirnbauer1, Norbert Jakse1, Petra Rugani1, Michael Schwaiger2, Marton Magyar3. 1. 1 Department of Oral surgery and Orthodontics, Medical University of Graz , Graz , Austria. 2. 2 Department of Maxillofacial surgery, Medical University of Graz , Graz , Austria. 3. 3 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz , Graz , Austria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Third molars often require surgical removal. Since three-dimensional radiological assessment is often indicated in difficult cases to avoid surgical complications, the radiation burden has to be considered. Here, MRI may offer a dose-free alternative to conventional X-ray techniques. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the assessment quality of MRI compared to panoramic radiography in impacted and partially impacted lower third molars. METHODS: Panoramic radiographs and MRI scans of 28 Caucasian patients were assessed twice by four investigators. Wisdom teeth were classified according to Juodzbalys and Daugela 2013. RESULTS: When radiological lower third molar assessments with panoramic radiography and MRI were compared, staging concurred in 73% in the first round of assessments and 77% in the second. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study demonstrates that MRI not only provides much the same information that panoramic radiography usually does, but also has the advantages of a dose-free three-dimensional view. This may facilitate and shorten third molar surgery. Image interpretation, however, can differ depending on training and experience.
OBJECTIVES: Third molars often require surgical removal. Since three-dimensional radiological assessment is often indicated in difficult cases to avoid surgical complications, the radiation burden has to be considered. Here, MRI may offer a dose-free alternative to conventional X-ray techniques. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the assessment quality of MRI compared to panoramic radiography in impacted and partially impacted lower third molars. METHODS: Panoramic radiographs and MRI scans of 28 Caucasian patients were assessed twice by four investigators. Wisdom teeth were classified according to Juodzbalys and Daugela 2013. RESULTS: When radiological lower third molar assessments with panoramic radiography and MRI were compared, staging concurred in 73% in the first round of assessments and 77% in the second. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study demonstrates that MRI not only provides much the same information that panoramic radiography usually does, but also has the advantages of a dose-free three-dimensional view. This may facilitate and shorten third molar surgery. Image interpretation, however, can differ depending on training and experience.
Authors: Pia Baumann; Thomas Widek; Heiko Merkens; Julian Boldt; Andreas Petrovic; Martin Urschler; Barbara Kirnbauer; Norbert Jakse; Eva Scheurer Journal: Forensic Sci Int Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 2.395
Authors: Djaudat Idiyatullin; Curt Corum; Steen Moeller; Hari S Prasad; Michael Garwood; Donald R Nixdorf Journal: J Endod Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 4.171
Authors: J B Ludlow; R Timothy; C Walker; R Hunter; E Benavides; D B Samuelson; M J Scheske Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2015 Impact factor: 2.419