Literature DB >> 15510357

Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty.

Srinivas M Susarla1, Thomas B Dodson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the difficulty of third molar (M3) extractions and to identify demographic, anatomic, and operative variables associated with extraction difficulty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To address the research purpose, we implemented a prospective cohort study and enrolled a sample composed of patients presenting for M3 removal. Predictor variables were categorized as demographic, anatomic, and operative. The primary outcome variable was difficulty of extraction, measured as extraction time per tooth. The secondary outcome variable was the surgeons postoperative estimate of M3 extraction difficulty, measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Appropriate univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistics were computed.
RESULTS: The sample was composed of 82 subjects, having 250 M3s (53.2% mandibular) extracted, with a mean age of 26.2 +/- 10.7 years; 57.3% were female, 72.0% were white. The mean operating time per M3 extraction was 6.9 +/- 7.6 minutes. The mean estimate of difficulty was 39.6 +/- 24.7 mm and was significantly correlated (r = 0.68) with extraction time (P < .01). Surgical experience, M3 location (maxillary versus mandibular), procedure type, tooth position, number of teeth extracted, and tooth morphology were statistically associated (P < or = .05) with extraction time in a multivariate model.
CONCLUSION: Our model indicates that the difficulty of M3 extractions is governed primarily by anatomic and operative factors with minimal influence from demographic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15510357     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  30 in total

1.  The relationship between resting arterial blood pressure and oral postsurgical pain.

Authors:  Christophe Deschaumes; Laurent Devoize; Yannick Sudrat; Martine Baudet-Pommel; Christian Dualé; Radhouane Dallel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A multivariate statistical analysis on variables affecting inferior alveolar nerve damage during third molar surgery.

Authors:  R Pippi; M Santoro
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  Third molar removal and its impact on quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Duarte-Rodrigues; Ednele Fabyene Primo Miranda; Taiane Oliveira Souza; Haroldo Neves de Paiva; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci; Endi Lanza Galvão
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal.

Authors:  Lennart Flygare; Anders Ohman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Modelling clinical decision-making in triage of referrals for extraction.

Authors:  A Lalli; W Slabbert; Z J Killick; E Quartey; P Marsden; F Mumford; J Jones
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 6.  Is Pederson Index a True Predictive Difficulty Index for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Bali; Deepika Bali; Ashutosh Sharma; Gaurav Verma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-09-22

7.  Mandibular third molar impactions in male adults: Relationship of Operative time and Types of impaction on inflammatory complications.

Authors:  Samir Mansuri; Abdul Mujeeb; Seema Abid Hussain; Mohammed Abid Zahir Hussain
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-04-26

8.  Evaluation capability of surgical difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a retrospective study from a post-graduate institution.

Authors:  Roberto Pippi
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-03-31

9.  Impact of Aprotinin - A Proteolytic Enzyme on Postsurgical Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Third Molar Surgeries.

Authors:  Visakan Jegadeesan; Deepa Ponnaiyan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

10.  3.0 Tesla MRI in the early evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve neurological complications after mandibular third molar extraction: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Cassetta; N Pranno; F Barchetti; V Sorrentino; L Lo Mele
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.