Literature DB >> 15058618

Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.

Giuseppe Monaco1, Marco Montevecchi, Giulio Alessandri Bonetti, Maria Rosaria Antonella Gatto, Luigi Checchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study to evaluate the predictive value of five radiographic markers on the panoramic radiograph, or PR, to point out the relationship between the mandibular canal and the impacted third molar.
METHODS: The authors evaluated the accuracy of the radiographic markers by comparing the PR with an axial computed tomographic, or CT, scan. They identified a sample of 73 third molars that showed a close relationship between the tooth roots and the mandibular canal on the PR, and then classified them on the basis of five radiographic markers. They also detected contact between the third molar and the mandibular canal on the CT scan.
RESULTS: The distribution of the five radiographic markers was as follows: 37 teeth exhibited increased radiolucency, 13 exhibited superimposition, 14 exhibited interruption of the radiopaque border, 14 exhibited narrowing of the canal and seven exhibited diversion of the canal. In 11 cases, two or more markers were recognizable. The predictive values of a positive test result were as follows: increased radiolucency, 73 percent; superimposition, 38.5 percent; interruption of the radiopaque border, 71.4 percent; narrowing, 78.6 percent; and diversion, 100 percent. The authors detected contact in all of the cases that exhibited two or more markers.
CONCLUSION: Increased radiolucency, narrowing and interruption of the radiopaque border, as well as the concomitant presence of two or more radiographic markers, on the PR were highly predictive of contact between the third molar and the mandibular canal. An axial CT scan probably is indicated in such cases. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study may lead to some guidelines for oral surgeons evaluating whether to obtain an axial CT scan for further investigation after examining an impacted mandibular third molar via PR.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15058618     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  43 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal.

Authors:  F S Neves; T C Souza; S M Almeida; F Haiter-Neto; D Q Freitas; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A multivariate statistical analysis on variables affecting inferior alveolar nerve damage during third molar surgery.

Authors:  R Pippi; M Santoro
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Ability of two radiographic methods to identify the closeness between the mandibular third molar root and the inferior alveolar canal: a pilot study.

Authors:  S Kositbowornchai; W Densiri-aksorn; P Piumthanaroj
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal.

Authors:  Lennart Flygare; Anders Ohman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Assessing the need for computed tomography for lower-third-molar extraction: a survey among 322 dentists.

Authors:  S Sivolella; G Boccuzzo; E Gasparini; G De Conti; M Berengo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Preliminary results of a study comparing conventional radiography with phase-contrast radiography for assessing root morphology of mandibular third molars.

Authors:  T Sato; N Nakamoto; T Abe; Y Fukushima; Y Tomaru; Y Sakata; M Nakazawa; A Nakamoto; H Kawasaki; Y Wada; H Ohara; R Araki; J Tanaka; T Yoda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal.

Authors:  L H Matzen; J Christensen; H Hintze; S Schou; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Comparison of panoramic radiography with cone beam CT in predicting the relationship of the mandibular third molar roots to the alveolar canal.

Authors:  Shoaleh Shahidi; Barbod Zamiri; Pegah Bronoosh
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-06-14

10.  Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Raul Botetano; Jorge Beltran; Keith Horner; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.