Alexey V Dimov1,2, Tian Liu3, Pascal Spincemaille2, Jacob S Ecanow4,5, Huan Tan4,6, Robert R Edelman4,7, Yi Wang1,2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. 3. Medimagemetric, LLC, New York, New York, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA. 5. University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 6. Department of Surgery (Neurosurgery), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 7. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to address the unsolved problem of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of tissue with fat where both fat and susceptibility change the MR signal phase. THEORY AND METHODS: The chemical shift of fat was treated as an additional unknown and was estimated jointly with susceptibility to provide the best data fitting using an automated and iterative algorithm. A simplified susceptibility model was used to calculate an updated value of the chemical shift based on the local magnetic field in each iteration. Numerical simulation, phantom experiments and in vivo imaging were performed. Artifacts were assessed by measuring the susceptibility variance in uniform regions. Accuracy was assessed by comparison with ground truth in simulation, and using a susceptibility matching approach in phantom. RESULTS: Using the proposed method, artifacts on the QSM image were markedly suppressed in all tested datasets compared with results generated using fixed chemical shifts. Accuracy of the estimated susceptibility was also improved in numerical simulation and phantom experiments. CONCLUSION: A joint estimation of fat content and magnetic susceptibility using an iterative chemical shift update was shown to improve image quality and accuracy on QSM images.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to address the unsolved problem of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of tissue with fat where both fat and susceptibility change the MR signal phase. THEORY AND METHODS: The chemical shift of fat was treated as an additional unknown and was estimated jointly with susceptibility to provide the best data fitting using an automated and iterative algorithm. A simplified susceptibility model was used to calculate an updated value of the chemical shift based on the local magnetic field in each iteration. Numerical simulation, phantom experiments and in vivo imaging were performed. Artifacts were assessed by measuring the susceptibility variance in uniform regions. Accuracy was assessed by comparison with ground truth in simulation, and using a susceptibility matching approach in phantom. RESULTS: Using the proposed method, artifacts on the QSM image were markedly suppressed in all tested datasets compared with results generated using fixed chemical shifts. Accuracy of the estimated susceptibility was also improved in numerical simulation and phantom experiments. CONCLUSION: A joint estimation of fat content and magnetic susceptibility using an iterative chemical shift update was shown to improve image quality and accuracy on QSM images.
Authors: E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Tian Liu; Jing Liu; Ludovic de Rochefort; Pascal Spincemaille; Ildar Khalidov; James Robert Ledoux; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tian Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Ludovic de Rochefort; Richard Wong; Martin Prince; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Tian Liu; Ildar Khalidov; Ludovic de Rochefort; Pascal Spincemaille; Jing Liu; A John Tsiouris; Yi Wang Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Amanda K Funai; Jeffrey A Fessler; Desmond T B Yeo; Valur T Olafsson; Douglas C Noll Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Xing Lu; Yajun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Qun He; Adam Searleman; Annette von Drygalski; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Luning Wang; Mikko J Nissi; Ferenc Toth; Casey P Johnson; Michael Garwood; Cathy S Carlson; Jutta Ellermann Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kofi Deh; Thanh D Nguyen; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler; Martin R Prince; Pascal Spincemaille; Susan Gauthier; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Yan Zhang; Yi Wang Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Yi Wang; Pascal Spincemaille; Zhe Liu; Alexey Dimov; Kofi Deh; Jianqi Li; Yan Zhang; Yihao Yao; Kelly M Gillen; Alan H Wilman; Ajay Gupta; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Gloria Chia-Yi Chiang; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Lawrence Tanenbaum; Weiwei Chen; Wenzhen Zhu; Shixin Chang; Min Lou; Brian H Kopell; Michael G Kaplitt; David Devos; Toshinori Hirai; Xuemei Huang; Yukunori Korogi; Alexander Shtilbans; Geon-Ho Jahng; Daniel Pelletier; Susan A Gauthier; David Pitt; Ashley I Bush; Gary M Brittenham; Martin R Prince Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Yan Wen; Thanh D Nguyen; Zhe Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Dong Zhou; Alexey Dimov; Youngwook Kee; Kofi Deh; Jiwon Kim; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 4.668