PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of brain quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in healthy subjects and in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on 1.5 and 3T scanners from two vendors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and 10 patients were scanned twice on a 3T scanner from one vendor. The healthy volunteers were also scanned on a 1.5T scanner from the same vendor and on a 3T scanner from a second vendor. Similar imaging parameters were used for all scans. QSM images were reconstructed using a recently developed nonlinear morphology-enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm with L1 regularization. Region-of-interest (ROI) measurements were obtained for 20 major brain structures. Reproducibility was evaluated with voxel-wise and ROI-based Bland-Altman plots and linear correlation analysis. RESULTS: ROI-based QSM measurements showed excellent correlation between all repeated scans (correlation coefficient R ≥ 0.97), with a mean difference of less than 1.24 ppb (healthy subjects) and 4.15 ppb (patients), and 95% limits of agreements of within -25.5 to 25.0 ppb (healthy subjects) and -35.8 to 27.6 ppb (patients). Voxel-based QSM measurements had a good correlation (0.64 ≤ R ≤ 0.88) and limits of agreements of -60 to 60 ppb or less. CONCLUSION: Brain QSM measurements have good interscanner and same-scanner reproducibility for healthy and MS subjects, respectively, on the systems evaluated in this study.
PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of brain quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in healthy subjects and in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on 1.5 and 3T scanners from two vendors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and 10 patients were scanned twice on a 3T scanner from one vendor. The healthy volunteers were also scanned on a 1.5T scanner from the same vendor and on a 3T scanner from a second vendor. Similar imaging parameters were used for all scans. QSM images were reconstructed using a recently developed nonlinear morphology-enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm with L1 regularization. Region-of-interest (ROI) measurements were obtained for 20 major brain structures. Reproducibility was evaluated with voxel-wise and ROI-based Bland-Altman plots and linear correlation analysis. RESULTS: ROI-based QSM measurements showed excellent correlation between all repeated scans (correlation coefficient R ≥ 0.97), with a mean difference of less than 1.24 ppb (healthy subjects) and 4.15 ppb (patients), and 95% limits of agreements of within -25.5 to 25.0 ppb (healthy subjects) and -35.8 to 27.6 ppb (patients). Voxel-based QSM measurements had a good correlation (0.64 ≤ R ≤ 0.88) and limits of agreements of -60 to 60 ppb or less. CONCLUSION: Brain QSM measurements have good interscanner and same-scanner reproducibility for healthy and MS subjects, respectively, on the systems evaluated in this study.
Authors: Jan Klohs; Andreas Deistung; Ferdinand Schweser; Joanes Grandjean; Marco Dominietto; Conny Waschkies; Roger M Nitsch; Irene Knuesel; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Markus Rudin Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Huan Tan; Tian Liu; Ying Wu; Jon Thacker; Robert Shenkar; Abdul Ghani Mikati; Changbin Shi; Conner Dykstra; Yi Wang; Pottumarthi V Prasad; Robert R Edelman; Issam A Awad Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Jing Liu; Tian Liu; Ludovic de Rochefort; James Ledoux; Ildar Khalidov; Weiwei Chen; A John Tsiouris; Cynthia Wisnieff; Pascal Spincemaille; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Berkin Bilgic; Audrey P Fan; Jonathan R Polimeni; Stephen F Cauley; Marta Bianciardi; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Lawrence L Wald; Kawin Setsompop Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xu Li; Deepti S Vikram; Issel Anne L Lim; Craig K Jones; Jonathan A D Farrell; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-04-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ulrike W Kaunzner; Yeona Kang; Shun Zhang; Eric Morris; Yihao Yao; Sneha Pandya; Sandra M Hurtado Rua; Calvin Park; Kelly M Gillen; Thanh D Nguyen; Yi Wang; David Pitt; Susan A Gauthier Journal: Brain Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Yi Wang; Pascal Spincemaille; Zhe Liu; Alexey Dimov; Kofi Deh; Jianqi Li; Yan Zhang; Yihao Yao; Kelly M Gillen; Alan H Wilman; Ajay Gupta; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Gloria Chia-Yi Chiang; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Lawrence Tanenbaum; Weiwei Chen; Wenzhen Zhu; Shixin Chang; Min Lou; Brian H Kopell; Michael G Kaplitt; David Devos; Toshinori Hirai; Xuemei Huang; Yukunori Korogi; Alexander Shtilbans; Geon-Ho Jahng; Daniel Pelletier; Susan A Gauthier; David Pitt; Ashley I Bush; Gary M Brittenham; Martin R Prince Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Andrew W Gorman; Kofi M Deh; Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Julie R White; Ernest Victor Groman; Clark A Fisher; Kelly M Gillen; Pascal Spincemaille; Skye Rasmussen; Martin R Prince; Henning U Voss; Winrich A Freiwald; Yi Wang Journal: Comp Med Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Ramin Jafari; Stefanie J Hectors; Anne K Koehne de González; Pascal Spincemaille; Martin R Prince; Gary M Brittenham; Yi Wang Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Kofi Deh; Keigo Kawaji; Marjolein Bulk; Louise Van Der Weerd; Emelie Lind; Pascal Spincemaille; Kelly McCabe Gillen; Johan Van Auderkerke; Yi Wang; Thanh D Nguyen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 4.668