Literature DB >> 24945665

Dissociable causal roles for left and right parietal cortex in controlling attentional biases from the contents of working memory.

Anastasia Kiyonaga1, Franziska M Korb1, John Lucas1, David Soto2, Tobias Egner3.   

Abstract

The contents of working memory (WM) steer visual attention, but the extent of this guidance can be strategically enhanced or inhibited when WM content is reliably helpful or harmful to a visual task. Current understanding of the neural substrates mediating the cognitive control over WM biases is limited, however, by the correlational nature of functional MRI approaches. A recent fMRI study provided suggestive evidence for a functional lateralization of these control processes in posterior parietal cortex (PPC): activity in left PPC correlated with the presentation of WM cues that ought to be strategically enhanced to optimize performance, while activity in the right PPC correlated with the presentation of cues that ought to be inhibited to prevent detrimental attentional biases in a visual search. Here, we aimed to directly assess whether the left and right PPC are causally involved in the cognitive control of WM biases, and to clarify their precise functional contributions. We therefore applied 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to left and right PPC (and a vertex control site) prior to administering a behavioral task assessing WM biasing control functions. We observed that the perturbation of left PPC eliminated the strategic benefit of predictably helpful WM cueing, while the perturbation of right PPC amplified the cost of unpredictable detrimental WM cueing. The left and right PPC thus play distinct causal roles in WM-attention interactions: the left PPC to maximize benefits, and the right PPC to minimize costs, of internally maintained content on visual attention.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Parietal cortex; Visual attention; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24945665      PMCID: PMC4209476          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  35 in total

1.  The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: a replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex.

Authors:  K A McConnell; Z Nahas; A Shastri; J P Lorberbaum; F A Kozel; D E Bohning; M S George
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 2.  Space and attention in parietal cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 3.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: a new synthesis of methodological issues.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Carlo Umiltà; Elena Rusconi
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: signal suppression or neural noise generation?

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Colin W G Clifford; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Zaira Cattaneo; Lorella Battelli; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  The extent of center-surround inhibition for colored items in working memory.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Heming Gao; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-16

2.  Center-Surround Inhibition in Working Memory.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Hemisphere-specific Parietal Contributions to the Interplay between Working Memory and Attention.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; John P Powers; Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.420

4.  Enhancing Visuospatial Working Memory Performance Using Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Ronald Ngetich; Donggang Jin; Wenjuan Li; Bian Song; Junjun Zhang; Zhenlan Jin; Ling Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Evaluating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Posterior Parietal Cortex in Memory-Guided Attention With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Min Wang; Ping Yang; Chaoyang Wan; Zhenlan Jin; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.