Literature DB >> 11274657

The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: a replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex.

K A McConnell1, Z Nahas, A Shastri, J P Lorberbaum, F A Kozel, D E Bohning, M S George.   

Abstract

Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a handheld electrified copper coil against the scalp produces a powerful and rapidly oscillating magnetic field, which in turn induces electrical currents in the brain. The amount of electrical energy needed for TMS to induce motor movement (called the motor threshold [MT]), varies widely across individuals. The intensity of TMS is dosed relative to the MT. Kozel et al observed in a depressed cohort that MT increases as a function of distance from coil to cortex. This article examines this relationship in a healthy cohort and compares the two methods of assessing distance to cortex. Seventeen healthy adults had their TMS MT determined and marked with a fiducial. Magnetic resonance images showed the fiducials marking motor cortex, allowing researchers to measure distance from scalp to motor and prefontal cortex using two methods: 1) measuring a line from scalp to the nearest cortex and 2) sampling the distance from scalp to cortex of two 18-mm-square areas. Confirming Kozel's previous finding, we observe that motor threshold increases as distance to motor cortex increased for both methods of measuring distance and that no significant correlation exists between MT and prefontal cortex distance. Distance from TMS coil to motor cortex is an important determinant of MT in healthy and depressed adults. Distance to prefontal cortex is not correlated with MT, raising questions about the common practice of dosing prefontal stimulation using MT determined over motor cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11274657     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01039-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  58 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Parameterization of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Michael T Rubens; Theodore P Zanto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models.

Authors:  Mirko Windhoff; Alexander Opitz; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Abnormal motor cortex excitability is associated with reduced cortical thickness in X monosomy.

Authors:  Jean-François Lepage; Cédric Clouchoux; Maryse Lassonde; Alan C Evans; Cheri L Deal; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Prefrontal TMS produces smaller EEG responses than motor-cortex TMS: implications for rTMS treatment in depression.

Authors:  Seppo Kähkönen; Soile Komssi; Juha Wilenius; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Laterality of interhemispheric inhibition depends on handedness.

Authors:  T Bäumer; E Dammann; F Bock; S Klöppel; H R Siebner; A Münchau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of coil-skull distance on transcranial magnetic stimulation motor-evoked responses.

Authors:  M Cukic; A Kalauzi; T Ilic; M Miskovic; M Ljubisavljevic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability predicts antidepressant response to prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Daniel Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Using simultaneous repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (rTMS/fNIRS) to measure brain activation and connectivity.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Fenghua Tian; Sameer Dhamne; Paul E Croarkin; Shawn M McClintock; Alan Elliott; Kimberly S Mapes; Mustafa M Husain; Hanli Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  FMRI effective connectivity and TMS chronometry: complementary accounts of causality in the visuospatial judgment network.

Authors:  Tom A de Graaf; Christianne Jacobs; Alard Roebroeck; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.