Literature DB >> 24943647

Novel PCA-VIP scheme for ranking MRI protocols and identifying computer-extracted MRI measurements associated with central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors.

Shoshana B Ginsburg1, Satish E Viswanath, B Nicolas Bloch, Neil M Rofsky, Elizabeth M Genega, Robert E Lenkinski, Anant Madabhushi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify computer-extracted features for central gland and peripheral zone prostate cancer localization on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative T2-weighted (T2w), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI were acquired from 23 men with confirmed prostate cancer. Following radical prostatectomy, the cancer extent was delineated by a pathologist on ex vivo histology and mapped to MRI by nonlinear registration of histology and corresponding MRI slices. In all, 244 computer-extracted features were extracted from MRI, and principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to reduce the data dimensionality so that a generalizable classifier could be constructed. A novel variable importance on projection (VIP) measure for PCA (PCA-VIP) was leveraged to identify computer-extracted MRI features that discriminate between cancer and normal prostate, and these features were used to construct classifiers for cancer localization.
RESULTS: Classifiers using features selected by PCA-VIP yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 and 0.85 for peripheral zone and central gland tumors, respectively. For tumor localization in the central gland, T2w, DCE, and DWI MRI features contributed 71.6%, 18.1%, and 10.2%, respectively; for peripheral zone tumors T2w, DCE, and DWI MRI contributed 29.6%, 21.7%, and 48.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: PCA-VIP identified relatively stable subsets of MRI features that performed well in localizing prostate cancer on MRI.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer-extracted features; feature selection; model interpretation; principal component analysis; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24943647      PMCID: PMC8176951          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  32 in total

1.  Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier.

Authors:  Ian Chan; William Wells; Robert V Mulkern; Steven Haker; Jianqing Zhang; Kelly H Zou; Stephan E Maier; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Oguz Akin; Evis Sala; Chaya S Moskowitz; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Nicole M Ishill; Darko Pucar; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Value of multiparametric MRI in the work-up of prostate cancer.

Authors:  F Cornud; N B Delongchamps; P Mozer; F Beuvon; A Schull; N Muradyan; M Peyromaure
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging in comparison with sextant biopsy.

Authors:  Jin Yamamura; Georg Salomon; Ralph Buchert; Arne Hohenstein; Joachim Graessner; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Gerhard Adam; Ulrike Wedegaertner
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo T2-weighted MR imagery.

Authors:  Satish E Viswanath; Nicholas B Bloch; Jonathan C Chappelow; Robert Toth; Neil M Rofsky; Elizabeth M Genega; Robert E Lenkinski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: computer-aided diagnosis versus single perfusion parameter maps.

Authors:  Yu Sub Sung; Heon-Ju Kwon; Bum-Woo Park; Gyunggoo Cho; Chang Kyung Lee; Kyoung-Sik Cho; Jeong Kon Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Greg Karczmar; Cheng Yang; James Dignam; Thomas F Gajewski; Hedy Kindler; Everett Vokes; Peter MacEneany; Myrosia T Mitchell; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Computerized image analysis for identifying triple-negative breast cancers and differentiating them from other molecular subtypes of breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Shannon C Agner; Mark A Rosen; Sarah Englander; John E Tomaszewski; Michael D Feldman; Paul Zhang; Carolyn Mies; Mitchell D Schnall; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography.

Authors:  I S Gribbestad; G Nilsen; H E Fjøsne; S Kvinnsland; O A Haugen; P A Rinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Prostate cancer: sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy--results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Weinreb; Jeffrey D Blume; Fergus V Coakley; Thomas M Wheeler; Jean B Cormack; Christopher K Sotto; Haesun Cho; Akira Kawashima; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal; Katarzyna J Macura; Mark Rosen; Scott R Gerst; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  18 in total

1.  Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Rakesh Shiradkar; Soumya Ghose; Ivan Jambor; Pekka Taimen; Otto Ettala; Andrei S Purysko; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images.

Authors:  Patrick Leo; George Lee; Natalie N C Shih; Robin Elliott; Michael D Feldman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-10-24

3.  Quantitative nuclear histomorphometry predicts oncotype DX risk categories for early stage ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Jon Whitney; German Corredor; Andrew Janowczyk; Shridar Ganesan; Scott Doyle; John Tomaszewski; Michael Feldman; Hannah Gilmore; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 4.  Novel Quantitative Imaging for Predicting Response to Therapy: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

5.  Radiomics and machine learning of multisequence multiparametric prostate MRI: Towards improved non-invasive prostate cancer characterization.

Authors:  Jussi Toivonen; Ileana Montoya Perez; Parisa Movahedi; Harri Merisaari; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Jonne Pohjankukka; Aida Kiviniemi; Tapio Pahikkala; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An integrated segmentation and shape-based classification scheme for distinguishing adenocarcinomas from granulomas on lung CT.

Authors:  Mehdi Alilou; Niha Beig; Mahdi Orooji; Prabhakar Rajiah; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Sagar Rakshit; Niyoti Reddy; Michael Yang; Frank Jacono; Robert C Gilkeson; Philip Linden; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Shoshana B Ginsburg; Ahmad Algohary; Shivani Pahwa; Vikas Gulani; Lee Ponsky; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Pekka Taimen; Robert Villani; Phillip Stricker; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Ivan Jambor; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Computer-extracted Features Can Distinguish Noncancerous Confounding Disease from Prostatic Adenocarcinoma at Multiparametric MR Imaging.

Authors:  Geert J S Litjens; Robin Elliott; Natalie N C Shih; Michael D Feldman; Thiele Kobus; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz; Henkjan J Huisman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Repeatability of radiomics and machine learning for DWI: Short-term repeatability study of 112 patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Harri Merisaari; Pekka Taimen; Rakesh Shiradkar; Otto Ettala; Marko Pesola; Jani Saunavaara; Peter J Boström; Anant Madabhushi; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.