Literature DB >> 27990722

Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.

Shoshana B Ginsburg1, Ahmad Algohary1, Shivani Pahwa2, Vikas Gulani2, Lee Ponsky3, Hannu J Aronen4, Peter J Boström5, Maret Böhm6, Anne-Maree Haynes6, Phillip Brenner7, Warick Delprado8, James Thompson6, Marley Pulbrock6, Pekka Taimen9, Robert Villani10, Phillip Stricker7, Ardeshir R Rastinehad11, Ivan Jambor4, Anant Madabhushi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a multi-institutional study whether radiomic features useful for prostate cancer (PCa) detection from 3 Tesla (T) multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in the transition zone (TZ) differ from those in the peripheral zone (PZ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3T mpMRI, including T2-weighted (T2w), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), were retrospectively obtained from 80 patients at three institutions. This study was approved by the institutional review board of each participating institution. First-order statistical, co-occurrence, and wavelet features were extracted from T2w MRI and ADC maps, and contrast kinetic features were extracted from DCE-MRI. Feature selection was performed to identify 10 features for PCa detection in the TZ and PZ, respectively. Two logistic regression classifiers used these features to detect PCa and were evaluated by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Classifier performance was compared with a zone-ignorant classifier.
RESULTS: Radiomic features that were identified as useful for PCa detection differed between TZ and PZ. When classification was performed on a per-voxel basis, a PZ-specific classifier detected PZ tumors on an independent test set with significantly higher accuracy (AUC = 0.61-0.71) than a zone-ignorant classifier trained to detect cancer throughout the entire prostate (P < 0.05). When classifiers were evaluated on MRI data from multiple institutions, statistically similar AUC values (P > 0.14) were obtained for all institutions.
CONCLUSION: A zone-aware classifier significantly improves the accuracy of cancer detection in the PZ. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:184-193.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance imaging; multi-institutional; prostate cancer; radiomics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27990722      PMCID: PMC5464994          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  29 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Emilie Niaf; Olivier Rouvière; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Flavie Bratan; Carole Lartizien
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information.

Authors:  Jonathan Chappelow; B Nicolas Bloch; Neil Rofsky; Elizabeth Genega; Robert Lenkinski; William DeWolf; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Rotating frame relaxation imaging of prostate cancer: Repeatability, cancer detection, and Gleason score prediction.

Authors:  Ivan Jambor; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Harri Merisaari; Peter J Boström; Heikki Minn; Timo Liimatainen; Hannu J Aronen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  MRI of localized prostate cancer: coming of age in the PSA era.

Authors:  Barış Türkbey; Marcelino Bernardo; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Pilot study of a novel tool for input-free automated identification of transition zone prostate tumors using T2- and diffusion-weighted signal and textural features.

Authors:  Joseph N Stember; Fang-Ming Deng; Samir S Taneja; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo T2-weighted MR imagery.

Authors:  Satish E Viswanath; Nicholas B Bloch; Jonathan C Chappelow; Robert Toth; Neil M Rofsky; Elizabeth M Genega; Robert E Lenkinski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Prostate cancer: computer-aided diagnosis with multiparametric 3-T MR imaging--effect on observer performance.

Authors:  Thomas Hambrock; Pieter C Vos; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz; Henkjan J Huisman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Incremental learning with SVM for multimodal classification of prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  José Fernando García Molina; Lei Zheng; Metin Sertdemir; Dietmar J Dinter; Stefan Schönberg; Matthias Rädle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Logistic regression model for diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer on multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dikaios; Jokha Alkalbani; Harbir Singh Sidhu; Taiki Fujiwara; Mohamed Abd-Alazeez; Alex Kirkham; Clare Allen; Hashim Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Alex Freeman; Steve Halligan; Stuart Taylor; David Atkinson; Shonit Punwani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  35 in total

1.  Multisite evaluation of radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminability for identifying peripheral zone prostate tumors on MRI.

Authors:  Prathyush Chirra; Patrick Leo; Michael Yim; B Nicolas Bloch; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Andrei Purysko; Mark Rosen; Anant Madabhushi; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 2.  Novel Quantitative Imaging for Predicting Response to Therapy: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  A radiomics machine learning-based redefining score robustly identifies clinically significant prostate cancer in equivocal PI-RADS score 3 lesions.

Authors:  Ying Hou; Mei-Ling Bao; Chen-Jiang Wu; Jing Zhang; Yu-Dong Zhang; Hai-Bin Shi
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-01

4.  MRI radiomics analysis for predicting preoperative synchronous distant metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Huanhuan Liu; Caiyuan Zhang; Lijun Wang; Ran Luo; Jinning Li; Hui Zheng; Qiufeng Yin; Zhongyang Zhang; Shaofeng Duan; Xin Li; Dengbin Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  [Artificial intelligence and radiomics in MRI-based prostate diagnostics].

Authors:  Charlie Alexander Hamm; Nick Lasse Beetz; Lynn Jeanette Savic; Tobias Penzkofer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Radiomic features on MRI enable risk categorization of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Ahmad Algohary; Satish Viswanath; Rakesh Shiradkar; Soumya Ghose; Shivani Pahwa; Daniel Moses; Ivan Jambor; Ronald Shnier; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Andrei S Purysko; Sadhna Verma; Lee Ponsky; Phillip Stricker; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Urological Diseases and Management: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Aiswarya V L S Dhavileswarapu; Syed Zahid Raza; Hadis Karimi; Harneet Singh Khanuja; Dasharathraj K Shetty; Sufyan Ibrahim; Milap J Shah; Nithesh Naik; Rahul Paul; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Radiomics prediction model for the improved diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI.

Authors:  Mengjuan Li; Tong Chen; Wenlu Zhao; Chaogang Wei; Xiaobo Li; Shaofeng Duan; Libiao Ji; Zhihua Lu; Junkang Shen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-02

Review 9.  Imaging biomarkers for evaluating tumor response: RECIST and beyond.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Ko; Lee-Ren Yeh; Yu-Ting Kuo; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2021-07-02

10.  T1 and T2 MR fingerprinting measurements of prostate cancer and prostatitis correlate with deep learning-derived estimates of epithelium, lumen, and stromal composition on corresponding whole mount histopathology.

Authors:  Rakesh Shiradkar; Ananya Panda; Patrick Leo; Andrew Janowczyk; Xavier Farre; Nafiseh Janaki; Lin Li; Shivani Pahwa; Amr Mahran; Christina Buzzy; Pingfu Fu; Robin Elliott; Gregory MacLennan; Lee Ponsky; Vikas Gulani; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.