Literature DB >> 31703155

Repeatability of radiomics and machine learning for DWI: Short-term repeatability study of 112 patients with prostate cancer.

Harri Merisaari1,2,3, Pekka Taimen4,5, Rakesh Shiradkar3, Otto Ettala6, Marko Pesola1, Jani Saunavaara7, Peter J Boström6, Anant Madabhushi3, Hannu J Aronen1,7, Ivan Jambor1,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate repeatability of prostate DWI-derived radiomics and machine learning methods for prostate cancer (PCa) characterization.
METHODS: A total of 112 patients with diagnosed PCa underwent 2 prostate MRI examinations (Scan1 and Scan2) performed on the same day. DWI was performed using 12 b-values (0-2000 s/mm2 ), post-processed using kurtosis function, and PCa areas were annotated using whole mount prostatectomy sections. A total of 1694 radiomic features including Sobel, Kirch, Gradient, Zernike Moments, Gabor, Haralick, CoLIAGe, Haar wavelet coefficients, 3D analogue to Laws features, 2D contours, and corner detectors were calculated. Radiomics and 4 feature pruning methods (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, maximum relevance minimum redundancy, Spearman's ρ, Wilcoxon rank-sum) were evaluated in terms of Scan1-Scan2 repeatability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)(3,1). Classification performance for clinically significant and insignificant PCa with Gleason grade groups 1 versus >1 was evaluated by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve in unseen random 30% data split.
RESULTS: The ICC(3,1) values for conventional radiomics and feature pruning methods were in the range of 0.28-0.90. The machine learning classifications varied between Scan1 and Scan2 with % of same class labels between Scan1 and Scan2 in the range of 61-81%. Surface-to-volume ratio and corner detector-based features were among the most represented features with high repeatability, ICC(3,1) >0.75, consistently high ranking using all 4 feature pruning methods, and classification performance with area under the receiver operator characteristic curve >0.70.
CONCLUSION: Surface-to-volume ratio and corner detectors for prostate DWI led to good classification of unseen data and performed similarly in Scan1 and Scan2 in contrast to multiple conventional radiomic features.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; corner detection; diffusion-weighted imaging; feature extraction; intraclass correlation coefficient; machine learning; prostate cancer; radiomics; repeatability; shape

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31703155      PMCID: PMC7047644          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  52 in total

1.  Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) : correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis.

Authors:  Jussi Toivonen; Harri Merisaari; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Tapio Pahikkala; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Multiparametric MRI and radiomics in prostate cancer: a review.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Hayley M Reynolds; Bimal Parameswaran; Darren Wraith; Mary E Finnegan; Scott Williams; Annette Haworth
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.430

3.  Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: A radiomic shape features study.

Authors:  Renato Cuocolo; Arnaldo Stanzione; Andrea Ponsiglione; Valeria Romeo; Francesco Verde; Massimiliano Creta; Roberto La Rocca; Nicola Longo; Leonardo Pace; Massimo Imbriaco
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Feasibility of diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging in prostate MRI for the assessment of prostate cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Michael Quentin; Gael Pentang; Lars Schimmöller; Olga Kott; Anja Müller-Lutz; Dirk Blondin; Christian Arsov; Andreas Hiester; Robert Rabenalt; Hans-Jörg Wittsack
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Computer determination of the constituent structure of biological images.

Authors:  R A Kirsch
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1971-06

6.  Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Chiharu Tamura; Hiroshi Shinmoto; Shigeyoshi Soga; Teppei Okamura; Hiroki Sato; Tomoyuki Okuaki; Yuxi Pang; Shigeru Kosuda; Tatsumi Kaji
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern; Anita Ramani; Hanzhang Lu; Kyle Kaczynski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  In vivo imaging of prostate cancer using [68Ga]-labeled bombesin analog BAY86-7548.

Authors:  Esa Kähkönen; Ivan Jambor; Jukka Kemppainen; Kaisa Lehtiö; Tove J Grönroos; Anna Kuisma; Pauliina Luoto; Henri J Sipilä; Tuula Tolvanen; Kalle Alanen; Jonna Silén; Markku Kallajoki; Anne Roivainen; Niklaus Schäfer; Roger Schibli; Martina Dragic; Anass Johayem; Ray Valencia; Sandra Borkowski; Heikki Minn
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Ahmed Hosny; Matthew B Schabath; Maryellen L Giger; Nicolai J Birkbak; Alireza Mehrtash; Tavis Allison; Omar Arnaout; Christopher Abbosh; Ian F Dunn; Raymond H Mak; Rulla M Tamimi; Clare M Tempany; Charles Swanton; Udo Hoffmann; Lawrence H Schwartz; Robert J Gillies; Raymond Y Huang; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in ensuring the generalizability of image quantitation methods for MRI.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Jana G Delfino; Kalina V Jordanova; Megan E Poorman; Prathyush Chirra; Akshay S Chaudhari; Bettina Baessler; Jessica Winfield; Satish E Viswanath; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 2.  The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Onur Yildirim; Sungmin Woo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Prostate Surface Distension and Tumor Texture Descriptors From Pre-Treatment MRI Are Associated With Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Rakesh Shiradkar; Soumya Ghose; Amr Mahran; Lin Li; Isaac Hubbard; Pingfu Fu; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Lee Ponsky; Andrei Purysko; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Texture analysis based on PI-RADS 4/5-scored magnetic resonance images combined with machine learning to distinguish benign lesions from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lu Ma; Qi Zhou; Huming Yin; Xiaojie Ang; Yu Li; Gansheng Xie; Gang Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 0.496

5.  Distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas by integrating stable and discriminating radiomic features on non-contrast computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Mohammadhadi Khorrami; Kaustav Bera; Rajat Thawani; Prabhakar Rajiah; Amit Gupta; Pingfu Fu; Philip Linden; Nathan Pennell; Frank Jacono; Robert C Gilkeson; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in the head and neck: a dual-3D-sequence multi-scan study.

Authors:  Cindy Xue; Jing Yuan; Yihang Zhou; Oi Lei Wong; Kin Yin Cheung; Siu Ki Yu
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2022-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.