Literature DB >> 19332850

Prostate cancer: sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy--results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study.

Jeffrey C Weinreb1, Jeffrey D Blume, Fergus V Coakley, Thomas M Wheeler, Jean B Cormack, Christopher K Sotto, Haesun Cho, Akira Kawashima, Clare M Tempany-Afdhal, Katarzyna J Macura, Mark Rosen, Scott R Gerst, John Kurhanewicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incremental benefit of combined endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging, as compared with endorectal MR imaging alone, for sextant localization of peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter study, conducted by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) from February 2004 to June 2005, was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Research associates were required to follow consent guidelines approved by the Office for Human Research Protection and established by the institutional review boards. One hundred thirty-four patients with biopsy-proved prostate adenocarcinoma and scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy were recruited at seven institutions. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and spectroscopic MR sequences were performed at 1.5 T by using a pelvic phased-array coil in combination with an endorectal coil. Eight readers independently rated the likelihood of the presence of PZ cancer in each sextant by using a five-point scale-first on MR images alone and later on combined MR-MR spectroscopic images. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were calculated with sextant as the unit of analysis. The presence or absence of cancer at centralized histopathologic evaluation of prostate specimens was the reference standard. Reader-specific receiver operating characteristic curves for values obtained with MR imaging alone and with combined MR imaging-MR spectroscopic imaging were developed. The AUCs were estimated by using Mann-Whitney statistics and appropriate 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Complete data were available for 110 patients (mean age, 58 years; range, 45-72 years). MR imaging alone and combined MR imaging-MR spectroscopic imaging had similar accuracy in PZ cancer localization (AUC, 0.60 vs 0.58, respectively; P > .05). AUCs for individual readers were 0.57-0.63 for MR imaging alone and 0.54-0.61 for combined MR imaging-MR spectroscopic imaging.
CONCLUSION: In patients who undergo radical prostatectomy, the accuracy of combined 1.5-T endorectal MR imaging-MR spectroscopic imaging for sextant localization of PZ prostate cancer is equal to that of MR imaging alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19332850      PMCID: PMC2663583          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2511080409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  44 in total

1.  Dualband spectral-spatial RF pulses for prostate MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  A A Schricker; J M Pauly; J Kurhanewicz; M G Swanson; D B Vigneron
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  The burden of illness of cancer: economic cost and quality of life.

Authors:  M L Brown; J Lipscomb; C Snyder
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from SEER-Medicare data.

Authors:  Martin L Brown; Gerald F Riley; Nicki Schussler; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Initial experience of 3 tesla endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and 1H-spectroscopic imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Tom W J Scheenen; Henkjan J Huisman; Dennis W J Klomp; Ferdi A van Dorsten; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; J Alfred Witjes; Arend Heerschap; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium.

Authors:  A W Partin; L A Mangold; D M Lamm; P C Walsh; J I Epstein; J D Pearson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial.

Authors:  M D Rifkin; E A Zerhouni; C A Gatsonis; L E Quint; D M Paushter; J I Epstein; U Hamper; P C Walsh; B J McNeil
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-09-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; B Malkowicz; M Schnall; D Schultz; K Cote; J E Tomaszewski; A Wein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate cancer tumor volume: measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz; Ying Lu; Kirk D Jones; Mark G Swanson; Silvia D Chang; Peter R Carroll; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  National practice patterns and time trends in androgen ablation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Gary D Grossfeld; Deborah P Lubeck; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Transition zone prostate cancer: metabolic characteristics at 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--initial results.

Authors:  Kristen L Zakian; Steven Eberhardt; Hedvig Hricak; Amita Shukla-Dave; Shanon Kleinman; Manickam Muruganandham; Kanishka Sircar; Michael W Kattan; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a promising tool for the diagnostics of human prostate cancer?

Authors:  Johannes Kurth; Elita Defeo; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Multiparametric MRI of the prostate at 3 T: limited value of 3D (1)H-MR spectroscopy as a fourth parameter.

Authors:  Stephan H Polanec; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Peter Brader; Dietmar Georg; Shahrokh Shariat; Claudio Spick; Martin Susani; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  M C Roethke; T H Kuru; S Schultze; D Tichy; A Kopp-Schneider; M Fenchel; H-P Schlemmer; B A Hadaschik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Prostate 3T-MR spectroscopic imaging without an endorectal surface coil using the MLEV-PRESS sequence.

Authors:  Takeshi Yoshizako; Koji Uchida; Shinji Hara; Yasushi Kaji; Masahiro Sumura; Mikio Igawa; Hajime Kitagaki; Mitsuhiro Uike; Tsuyoshi Matsuda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study.

Authors:  Flavie Bratan; Emilie Niaf; Christelle Melodelima; Anne Laure Chesnais; Rémi Souchon; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Marc Colombel; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Focal ablation of prostate cancer: four roles for magnetic resonance imaging guidance.

Authors:  Graham Sommer; Donna Bouley; Harcharan Gill; Bruce Daniel; Kim Butts Pauly; Chris Diederich
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 7.  Functional MR Imaging Techniques in Oncology in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 9.  DW-MRI of the urogenital tract: applications in oncology.

Authors:  G Petralia; H C Thoeny
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting.

Authors:  A V Taira; G S Merrick; R W Galbreath; H Andreini; W Taubenslag; R Curtis; W M Butler; E Adamovich; K E Wallner
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.