Literature DB >> 3961178

Influence of vertebral fat content on quantitative CT density.

A M Laval-Jeantet, B Roger, S Bouysee, C Bergot, R B Mazess.   

Abstract

Single- and dual-energy (85 and 130 kVp) computed tomographic (CT) measurements of bone density were made in 74 lumbar (L-3) vertebral specimens. Single-energy CT densities at 130 kVp consistently underestimated actual ash density by about 25 mg/cm3 in men and 40 mg/cm3 in women. CT densities overestimated age changes by 73% in women and 26% in men. These errors of the single-energy CT approach seemed due to increased marrow fat caused by age. At 130 kVp, there was a large decrease in apparent bone density (13 mg/cm3) for each increase of 100 mg/cm3 in fat content, but the decrease was lower at 85 kVp (11 mg/cm3), suggesting the use of lower energies for quantitative CT. In the vertebrae from the younger subjects (up to age 69), the relative error was 20%-31%, but in the oldest group it amounted to 31%-45%. The 95% confidence interval for an individual determination was +/- 38 mg/cm3. Dual-energy CT greatly reduced the above errors. Ash density was predicted with only a small accuracy error (7 mg/cm3) using a postprocessing dual-energy calculation, but the prediction error was 19 mg/cm3 for determinations at 130 kVp. The large uncertainty in the fat content of marrow (+/- 110 mg/cm3) and the variability in distribution of fat make dual-energy approaches necessary for accurate determinations of vertebral mineral density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3961178     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.159.2.3961178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  CT image analysis of the vertebral trabecular network in vivo.

Authors:  F Chevalier; A M Laval-Jeantet; M Laval-Jeantet; C Bergot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Accuracy of vertebral mineral determination by dual-energy quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W D Reinbold; C P Adler; W A Kalender; R Lente
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Advances in noninvasive bone measurement.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden; J Vetter; M Ettinger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Hip fractures in young patients: is this early osteoporosis?

Authors:  S D Boden; P Labropoulos; R Saunders
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Marrow Adipose Tissue Quantification of the Lumbar Spine by Using Dual-Energy CT and Single-Voxel (1)H MR Spectroscopy: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Miriam A Bredella; Scott M Daley; Mannudeep K Kalra; J Keenan Brown; Karen K Miller; Martin Torriani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Quantitative computed tomography: update 1987.

Authors:  H K Genant; P Steiger; J E Block; C C Glueer; B Ettinger; S T Harris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom.

Authors:  S D Boden; D J Goodenough; C D Stockham; E Jacobs; T Dina; R M Allman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 10.  Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.