Literature DB >> 24932563

Rapid and reliable DNA assembly via ligase cycling reaction.

Stefan de Kok, Leslie H Stanton, Todd Slaby, Maxime Durot, Victor F Holmes, Kedar G Patel, Darren Platt, Elaine B Shapland, Zach Serber, Jed Dean, Jack D Newman, Sunil S Chandran.   

Abstract

Assembly of DNA parts into DNA constructs is a foundational technology in the emerging field of synthetic biology. An efficient DNA assembly method is particularly important for high-throughput, automated DNA assembly in biofabrication facilities and therefore we investigated one-step, scarless DNA assembly via ligase cycling reaction (LCR). LCR assembly uses single-stranded bridging oligos complementary to the ends of neighboring DNA parts, a thermostable ligase to join DNA backbones, and multiple denaturation-annealing-ligation temperature cycles to assemble complex DNA constructs. The efficiency of LCR assembly was improved ca. 4-fold using designed optimization experiments and response surface methodology. Under these optimized conditions, LCR enabled one-step assembly of up to 20 DNA parts and up to 20 kb DNA constructs with very few single-nucleotide polymorphisms (<1 per 25 kb) and insertions/deletions (<1 per 50 kb). Experimental comparison of various sequence-independent DNA assembly methods showed that circular polymerase extension cloning (CPEC) and Gibson isothermal assembly did not enable assembly of more than four DNA parts with more than 50% of clones being correct. Yeast homologous recombination and LCR both enabled reliable assembly of up to 12 DNA parts with 60-100% of individual clones being correct, but LCR assembly provides a much faster and easier workflow than yeast homologous recombination. LCR combines reliable assembly of many DNA parts via a cheap, rapid, and convenient workflow and thereby outperforms existing DNA assembly methods. LCR assembly is expected to become the method of choice for both manual and automated high-throughput assembly of DNA parts into DNA constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24932563     DOI: 10.1021/sb4001992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Synth Biol        ISSN: 2161-5063            Impact factor:   5.110


  59 in total

1.  Modular and Integrative Vectors for Synthetic Biology Applications in Streptomyces spp.

Authors:  Céline Aubry; Jean-Luc Pernodet; Sylvie Lautru
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Bricks and blueprints: methods and standards for DNA assembly.

Authors:  Arturo Casini; Marko Storch; Geoffrey S Baldwin; Tom Ellis
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  Directed evolution combined with synthetic biology strategies expedite semi-rational engineering of genes and genomes.

Authors:  Zhen Kang; Junli Zhang; Peng Jin; Sen Yang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 4.  Synthetic Botany.

Authors:  Christian R Boehm; Bernardo Pollak; Nuri Purswani; Nicola Patron; Jim Haseloff
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  Semi-synthetic artemisinin: a model for the use of synthetic biology in pharmaceutical development.

Authors:  Chris J Paddon; Jay D Keasling
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Overview of Post Cohen-Boyer Methods for Single Segment Cloning and for Multisegment DNA Assembly.

Authors:  Bryan Sands; Roger Brent
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2016-01

Review 7.  Synthetic biology to access and expand nature's chemical diversity.

Authors:  Michael J Smanski; Hui Zhou; Jan Claesen; Ben Shen; Michael A Fischbach; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 8.  Recent advances in DNA assembly technologies.

Authors:  Ran Chao; Yongbo Yuan; Huimin Zhao
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Principles of genetic circuit design.

Authors:  Jennifer A N Brophy; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Rewriting yeast central carbon metabolism for industrial isoprenoid production.

Authors:  Adam L Meadows; Kristy M Hawkins; Yoseph Tsegaye; Eugene Antipov; Youngnyun Kim; Lauren Raetz; Robert H Dahl; Anna Tai; Tina Mahatdejkul-Meadows; Lan Xu; Lishan Zhao; Madhukar S Dasika; Abhishek Murarka; Jacob Lenihan; Diana Eng; Joshua S Leng; Chi-Li Liu; Jared W Wenger; Hanxiao Jiang; Lily Chao; Patrick Westfall; Jefferson Lai; Savita Ganesan; Peter Jackson; Robert Mans; Darren Platt; Christopher D Reeves; Poonam R Saija; Gale Wichmann; Victor F Holmes; Kirsten Benjamin; Paul W Hill; Timothy S Gardner; Annie E Tsong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.