Sophie Vivier1, Valérie Deken2, Younes Arous1, Jean-Baptiste Faivre1, Alain Duhamel2, Antoine Deschildre3, Thomas Flohr4, Jacques Remy1, Martine Remy-Jardin5. 1. Department of Thoracic Imaging, Hospital Calmette, Blvd Jules Leclercq, 59037, Lille cedex, France. 2. Santé Publique: épidémiologie et qualité des soins, University of Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France. 3. Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy Unit, University of Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France. 4. Department of CT Research & Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany. 5. Department of Thoracic Imaging, Hospital Calmette, Blvd Jules Leclercq, 59037, Lille cedex, France. martine.remy@chru-lille.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiation dose reduction is a primary objective in pediatric populations owing to the well-known risks of radiation-induced cancers. Low-energy photons participate in the radiation dose without significantly contributing to image formation. Their suppression by means of tin filtration should decrease the image noise, anticipating a subsequent application to dose saving. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the level of noise reduction achievable with tin (Sn) filtration at 100 kVp for chest computed tomography (CT) in comparison with a standard scanning mode at 70 kVp with comparable radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive children (Group 1) underwent non-contrast chest CT examinations on a third-generation dual-source CT system at tin-filtered 100 kVp and pitch 2. The tube-current time product (mAs) was adjusted to maintain the predicted dose length product (DLP) value at 70 kVp for the respective patient. Each child was then paired by weight and age to a child scanned at 70 kVp on the same CT unit (Group 2); Group 2 patients were consecutive patients, retrospectively selected from our database of children prospectively scanned at 70 kVp. Objective and subjective image quality were compared between the two groups of patients to investigate the overall image quality and level of noise reduction that could be subsequently achievable with tin filtration in clinical practice. RESULTS: The mean image noise was significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 when measured in the air (P<0.0001) and inside the aorta (P<0.001). The mean noise reduction was 21.6% (standard deviation [SD] 16.1) around the thorax and 12.0% (SD 32.7) inside the thorax. There was no significant difference in subjective image quality of lung and mediastinal images with excellent overall subjective scores in both groups. CONCLUSION: At comparable radiation dose, the image noise was found to be reduced by 21.6% compared to the 70-kVp protocol, providing basis for dose reduction without altering image quality in further investigations.
BACKGROUND: Radiation dose reduction is a primary objective in pediatric populations owing to the well-known risks of radiation-induced cancers. Low-energy photons participate in the radiation dose without significantly contributing to image formation. Their suppression by means of tin filtration should decrease the image noise, anticipating a subsequent application to dose saving. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the level of noise reduction achievable with tin (Sn) filtration at 100 kVp for chest computed tomography (CT) in comparison with a standard scanning mode at 70 kVp with comparable radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive children (Group 1) underwent non-contrast chest CT examinations on a third-generation dual-source CT system at tin-filtered 100 kVp and pitch 2. The tube-current time product (mAs) was adjusted to maintain the predicted dose length product (DLP) value at 70 kVp for the respective patient. Each child was then paired by weight and age to a child scanned at 70 kVp on the same CT unit (Group 2); Group 2 patients were consecutive patients, retrospectively selected from our database of children prospectively scanned at 70 kVp. Objective and subjective image quality were compared between the two groups of patients to investigate the overall image quality and level of noise reduction that could be subsequently achievable with tin filtration in clinical practice. RESULTS: The mean image noise was significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 when measured in the air (P<0.0001) and inside the aorta (P<0.001). The mean noise reduction was 21.6% (standard deviation [SD] 16.1) around the thorax and 12.0% (SD 32.7) inside the thorax. There was no significant difference in subjective image quality of lung and mediastinal images with excellent overall subjective scores in both groups. CONCLUSION: At comparable radiation dose, the image noise was found to be reduced by 21.6% compared to the 70-kVp protocol, providing basis for dose reduction without altering image quality in further investigations.
Authors: Marie-Odile Bernier; Hélène Baysson; Mark S Pearce; Monika Moissonnier; Elisabeth Cardis; Michael Hauptmann; Lara Struelens; Jeremie Dabin; Christoffer Johansen; Neige Journy; Dominique Laurier; Maria Blettner; Lucian Le Cornet; Roman Pokora; Patrycja Gradowska; Johanna M Meulepas; Kristina Kjaerheim; Tore Istad; Hilde Olerud; Aste Sovik; Magda Bosch de Basea; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Magnus Kaijser; Arvid Nordenskjöld; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Richard W Harbron; Ausrele Kesminiene Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael A Moore; Randheer Shailam; Bob Liu; Thomas L Toth; Ellen Grant; Sjirk J Westra Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: John D Newell; Matthew K Fuld; Thomas Allmendinger; Jered P Sieren; Kung-Sik Chan; Junfeng Guo; Eric A Hoffman Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.016