Literature DB >> 28607224

Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.

Robert K Shepherd1, Andrew K Wise, Ya Lang Enke, Paul M Carter, James B Fallon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants (CIs) have a limited number of independent stimulation channels due to the highly conductive nature of the fluid-filled cochlea. Attempts to develop highly focused stimulation to improve speech perception in CI users includes the use of simultaneous stimulation via multiple current sources. Focused multipolar (FMP) stimulation is an example of this approach and has been shown to reduce interaction between stimulating channels. However, compared with conventional biphasic current pulses generated from a single current source, FMP is a complex stimulus that includes extended periods of stimulation before charge recovery is achieved, raising questions on whether chronic stimulation with this strategy is safe. The present study evaluated the long-term safety of intracochlear stimulation using FMP in a preclinical animal model of profound deafness. APPROACH: Six cats were bilaterally implanted with scala tympani electrode arrays two months after deafening, and received continuous unilateral FMP stimulation at levels that evoked a behavioural response for periods of up to 182 d. Electrode impedance, electrically-evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) and auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) were monitored periodically over the course of the stimulation program from both the stimulated and contralateral control cochleae. On completion of the stimulation program cochleae were examined histologically and the electrode arrays were evaluated for evidence of platinum (Pt) corrosion. MAIN
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in electrode impedance between control and chronically stimulated electrodes following long-term FMP stimulation. Moreover, there was no significant difference between ECAP and EABR thresholds evoked from control or stimulated cochleae at either the onset of stimulation or at completion of the stimulation program. Chronic FMP stimulation had no effect on spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) survival when compared with unstimulated control cochleae. Long-term implantation typically evoked a mild foreign body reaction proximal to the electrode array; however stimulated cochleae exhibited a small but statistically significant increase in the tissue response. Finally, there was no evidence of Pt corrosion following long-term FMP stimulation; stimulated electrodes exhibited the same surface features as the unstimulated control electrodes. SIGNIFICANCE: Chronic intracochlear FMP stimulation at levels used in the present study did not adversely affect electrically-evoked neural thresholds or SGN survival but evoked a small, benign increase in inflammatory response compared to control ears. Moreover chronic FMP stimulation does not affect the surface of Pt electrodes at suprathreshold stimulus levels. These findings support the safe clinical application of an FMP stimulation strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28607224      PMCID: PMC5681383          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa7586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  41 in total

1.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  P A Leake; G T Hradek; R L Snyder
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels.

Authors:  Chris van den Honert; David C Kelsall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data.

Authors:  C N Jolly; F A Spelman; B M Clopton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats.

Authors:  Shefin S George; Andrew K Wise; Mohit N Shivdasani; Robert K Shepherd; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem.

Authors:  N A Hardie; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Scanning electron microscopy of chronically stimulated platinum intracochlear electrodes.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; M T Murray; M E Houghton; G M Clark
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  5 in total

1.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Paul M Carter; Ya Lang Enke; Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Platinum dissolution and tissue response following long-term electrical stimulation at high charge densities.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Paul M Carter; Ashley N Dalrymple; Ya Lang Enke; Andrew K Wise; Trung Nguyen; James Firth; Alex Thompson; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities: reducing platinum dissolution.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Paul M Carter; Ya Lang Enke; Alex Thompson; Brianna Flynn; Ella P Trang; Ashley N Dalrymple; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials.

Authors:  Megan J Foggia; Rene Vielman Quevedo; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.