Literature DB >> 19840841

Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.

H Christiaan Stronks1, Huib Versnel, Vera F Prijs, Sjaak F L Klis.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of electro-acoustical stimulation in people with a cochlear implant that have residual low-frequency hearing in the implanted ear. This raises the issue of how electrical and acoustical stimulation interact in the cochlea. We have investigated the effect of electrical stimulation on the acoustically evoked compound action potential (CAP) in normal-hearing guinea pigs. CAPs were evoked by tone bursts, and electric stimuli were delivered at the base of the cochlea using extracochlear electrodes. CAPs could be suppressed by electrical stimulation under various conditions. The dependence of CAP suppression on several parameters was investigated, including frequency and level of the acoustic stimulus, current level of the electric stimulus and the interval between electric and acoustic stimulus (EAI). Most pronounced suppression was observed when CAPs were evoked with high-frequency tones of low level. Suppression increased with current level and at high currents low-frequency evoked CAPs could also be suppressed. Suppression was typically absent several milliseconds after the electric stimulus. Suppression mediated by direct neural responses and hair cell mediated (electrophonic) responses is discussed. We conclude that the high-frequency part of the cochlea can be stimulated electrically with little detrimental effects on CAPs evoked by low-frequency tones. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19840841     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Payton Lin; Thomas Lu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  S Irving; A K Wise; R E Millard; R K Shepherd; J B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Temporary Neurotrophin Treatment Prevents Deafness-Induced Auditory Nerve Degeneration and Preserves Function.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Forward Electric Stimulation-Induced Interference in Intracochlear Electrocochleography of Acoustic Stimulation in the Cochlea of Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Shiyao Min; Tianhao Lu; Min Chen; Jiabao Mao; Xuerui Hu; Shufeng Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Brendan P O'Connell; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Hearing Loss After Activation of Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implants Might Be Related to Afferent Cochlear Innervation Injury.

Authors:  Jonathan C Kopelovich; Lina A J Reiss; Christine P Etler; Linjing Xu; J Tyler Bertroche; Bruce J Gantz; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future.

Authors:  S Irving; L Gillespie; R Richardson; D Rowe; J B Fallon; A K Wise
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.

Authors:  Marina Imsiecke; Benjamin Krüger; Andreas Büchner; Thomas Lenarz; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.

Authors:  Mika Sato; Peter Baumhoff; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Feasibility of Using Electrocochleography for Objective Estimation of Electro-Acoustic Interactions in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Hearing.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.